
Originally Posted by
Hulk
To say that Spinks did enough, in the second half of the fight in particular to win a world title is just abusrd.
He didn't get the job done in the second half of the fight. I haven't seen anyone disputing that. But I could easily counter that with "To say Karmazin did enough in the first half of the fight to win is absurd." Every round counts Hulk

Originally Posted by
Hulk
I had at least 115-113 Karmazin, in the beginning after 6 rounds I did have Spinks up legit 4 rounds to 2, but then he won either the 7th or 8th and that was bout it IMO.
That score is understandable, even though I had Spinks winning the 6th, and 7th and that was 7 rounds right there. I also think he won the 8th. He was more effective. Karmazin did get off an occasional good sequence but for the majority of the first 8 rounds, Spinks would jab, circle, lunge in and out, land at a high percentage. Then Karmazin would get one good 3 punch sequence off, rinse and repeat. It depends on what you think counts for more. I personally think that ring generalship and effectiveness won Spinks 7 of the first 8 rounds.

Originally Posted by
Hulk
Throughout the 9-12th and specially the championship rounds, 11 and 12, it was just a disgrace the way he fought. Folks get on ODLH for runnin from Tito? Hahaha. Spinks makes a career outta runnin, specially late in fights. Just listen to what his corner was tellin him, and you'll see what a winner he is.
I've never once said Spinks won those rounds. But the fact is the first half, or even the first 2/3 of the fight, he got the job done and Karmazin needed a KO to win once it got to the twelfth. Did I like it? No way. Was I impressed? Absolutely not. Am I commending Spinks for running? No. But he did what he had to do to win. Did you see Spinks' legs? He would have made Wladimir Klitschko look like Joe Louis, he was tired as all hell and like it or not, he had to run to win.

Originally Posted by
Hulk
I'm not sayin it was a good performance by Karmazin, but he definately did enough to retain his title.
Since when do you have to do MORE in the later rounds to take a title? The title doesn't change the rules of the fight. You win 7 rounds and you don't get knocked down, I don't care if you lose the "championship" rounds, you win the fight. He won 7 rounds on the judge's cards, what more do you want from him? It doesn't make a difference if you win 7 rounds on a club fight in the middle of Missouri or if you do it in Madison Square Garden, you win 7 rounds with no knockdowns or no rounds where you take a beating, you win the fight. The IBF title does not change that.

Originally Posted by
Hulk
I mean these same folks who condemn Winky for runnin in the 12th against Taylor, when he wasn't, praise and celebrate Spinks for it, or try to sweep it under the carpet.

Winky still had stuff left in the tank, but I still think he won the fight. I don't celebrate Spinks' performance in the last rounds at all. I just think he won the fight. I missed where that made me a Spinks fan.
Bookmarks