Do you believe in God?

[Smelodies]

I don't believe in god

I don't either. One personality created the universe and gives a shit what we do and say on this little crumb of a planet in a massive universe? It just seems too convenient. And too suspiciously like the idea thought up by someone with daddy issues. Which is not to say I wouldn't believe in a god (or gods) if you showed me sufficient evidence. But nobody's ever put forth convincing proof. It's usually New Agey babble when they try.

[walrus]

one thing is known, we will all find out eventually. The ride on this shit hole does not last forever.

[Smelodies]

one thing is known, we will all find out eventually.

Hardly a given. When death comes, it could also be that we just cease finding out about anything. Rather than coming to a realization, we may stop realizing.

[Dia bando]

It's coming up to the time, almost 12 months, one night I Believed In God I had drunk a bottle
of Grey goose vodka, and rather ill my my head stuck down the pan, I said GOD NEVER AGAIN.

[Andre]

(I see us like good bugs and bad bugs in a massive system).

A system that we can only see one portion of one part of one eleventh of what is the whole).

Even this question (Do you believe in God) is false in real terms ,its a leading question and stilted in mans self importance because it suggests everything is external, like a God would be a person external and not of the whole thereof (and only male energy).

There ARE eleven dimensions around us which all together make up the twelfth which is part of another whole; live with it.

[walrus]

Andre didn't I warn you about making sense, stop making sense Damnit. Now back to evolution. None of the intermediate fossils between invertebrates and vertebrates, fish and amphibians or between lower mammals and primates have been found. How do you feel on that, BFF.

[Smelodies]

Richard Dawkins: Show me the intermediate fossils! - Nebraska Vignettes #1 - YouTube

[walrus]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

[Smelodies]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

Stop it, I saw that, and that's not what he said.

[killersheep]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

On where life comes from. It's a fairly loaded question, as no one can provide evidence of it.

The atheist position is that "we can not know". The creationist position is "we have absolute truths".
Do you agree with my statements?

[walrus]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

On where life comes from. It's a fairly loaded question, as no one can provide evidence of it.

The atheist position is that "we can not know". The creationist position is "we have absolute truths".
Do you agree with my statements?

Actually we have been talking only on evolution at this point. Evolution does not explain the beginning of life on the planet. Interspecies evolution has been observed at the micro level so I am not saying evolution as a whole is not.

[killersheep]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

On where life comes from. It's a fairly loaded question, as no one can provide evidence of it.

The atheist position is that "we can not know". The creationist position is "we have absolute truths".
Do you agree with my statements?

Actually we have been talking only on evolution at this point. Evolution does not explain the beginning of life on the planet. Interspecies evolution has been observed at the micro level so I am not saying evolution as a whole is not.

This all relates, do you agree with the statements I have made?

[walrus]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

On where life comes from. It's a fairly loaded question, as no one can provide evidence of it.

The atheist position is that "we can not know". The creationist position is "we have absolute truths".
Do you agree with my statements?

Actually we have been talking only on evolution at this point. Evolution does not explain the beginning of life on the planet. Interspecies evolution has been observed at the micro level so I am not saying evolution as a whole is not.

This all relates, do you agree with the statements I have made?

In the past couple pages I wrote several posts on the subject. Don't forgot, evolution do feel they know how life was treated. Just a bunch of stuff from the primordial ooze created a single cell organism that evolved into the millions of plants and animals that we recognize today. So evolutionist feel they have proved where life has come from, so you are asking me to answer a question with false logic behind it.

[killersheep]

Dawkins is an as whole, use another source. When Richard Dawkins was pressed on where life came from he said we were brought here by aliens. Check it out, he was being interviewed by Ben Stein. He couldn't explain how the Aliens came to be.

On where life comes from. It's a fairly loaded question, as no one can provide evidence of it.

The atheist position is that "we can not know". The creationist position is "we have absolute truths".
Do you agree with my statements?

Actually we have been talking only on evolution at this point. Evolution does not explain the beginning of life on the planet. Interspecies evolution has been observed at the micro level so I am not saying evolution as a whole is not.

This all relates, do you agree with the statements I have made?

In the past couple pages I wrote several posts on the subject. Don't forgot, evolution do feel they know how life was treated. Just a bunch of stuff from the primordial ooze created a single cell organism that evolved into the millions of plants and animals that we recognize today. So evolutionist feel they have proved where life has come from, so you are king me to answer a question with false logic behind it.

We can not know, because we haven't reproduced it in a lab and it doesn't leave identifiable remains. While signs point to a conclusion, the fact of the matter is we can not know, we can only infer. Unlike the fossil record which is well documented.

[Galaxy]

Even if you believe in the miracles, the virgin birth, the resurrection etc that doesn't mean that Gods word is right.

The bible condones slavery, treats woman as less than men & is full of contradictions