How Would Ali Have Done In 90s

[Memphis]

C'mon mate. Take a look at the way your going about getting your point across

Tyson would ko Ali in about 4 or five rounds.

Can't take someone seriously when they have TYSONBESTEVER and that is totally wrong statement what you said anyway.

If that isnt 'Im right your wrong' I dont know what is.

Your persistance is to be admired though

[ICB]

C'mon mate. Take a look at the way your going about getting your point across

Tyson would ko Ali in about 4 or five rounds.

Can't take someone seriously when they have TYSONBESTEVER and that is totally wrong statement what you said anyway.

If that isnt 'Im right your wrong' I dont know what is.

Your persistance is to be admired though

i gave him cc its all good mate sometimes im little harsh but i mean no harm i like a debate Memphis and i never give up

[warreng]

Well he might not of been the most fleet footed fighter but he hit harder then ali nd had gd handspeed nd as for the conn fight he may of struggled but con was fast clever boxer who made it difficult for joe nd its not as if ali found it easy against every one as he had plenty of trouble against norton spinks so i dont how u can use one fight to say ali would easily beat louis

[Memphis]

C'mon mate. Take a look at the way your going about getting your point across

Tyson would ko Ali in about 4 or five rounds.

Can't take someone seriously when they have TYSONBESTEVER and that is totally wrong statement what you said anyway.

If that isnt 'Im right your wrong' I dont know what is.

Your persistance is to be admired though

i gave him cc its all good mate sometimes im little harsh but i mean no harm i like a debate Memphis and i never give up

Your not going to start a "No one had a better jab than Larry Holmes............Did they?" Thread are you?

[ICB]

Well he might not of been the most fleet footed fighter but he hit harder then ali nd had gd handspeed nd as for the conn fight he may of struggled but con was fast clever boxer who made it difficult for joe nd its not as if ali found it easy against every one as he had plenty of trouble against norton spinks so i dont how u can use one fight to say ali would easily beat louis

You answered my question Warren Conn was fast on his feet and very clever boxer just like Ali was except Ali wouldn't stand and trade and get koed while ahead like Conn did and Ali was well past it against Spinks and he gave Spinks lesson in rematch anyway and like i said before Norton had very weird style that confused Ali only 3 or 4 hws ever had style like Norton.

[Scrap]

If you think about it how does a blown up lt heavy who 4 years ago you would have given a chance of beating anyone of the champions james Toney, go against Ali, I dont think so

[ICB]

C'mon mate. Take a look at the way your going about getting your point across

Tyson would ko Ali in about 4 or five rounds.

Can't take someone seriously when they have TYSONBESTEVER and that is totally wrong statement what you said anyway.

If that isnt 'Im right your wrong' I dont know what is.

Your persistance is to be admired though

i gave him cc its all good mate sometimes im little harsh but i mean no harm i like a debate Memphis and i never give up

Your not going to start a "No one had a better jab than Larry Holmes............Did they?" Thread are you?

You spoiled it now Memphis

[sweet science]

ali takes them all. if he happens to lose one he wins the rematch.

[warreng]

yeah i c ur point about the styles but louis did go into the fight under 200lbs as conn was stepping up in weight nd he didnt want the difference to be to much plus like he won easily the second fihgt. but i still think louis would have a gd chance of beating ali nd u realy think ali would stay on the outside for the whole fight? i dont think he would as im sure youve seen his fights against foreman frazier or shavers.So for me this fight could go either way a possible ko or ud for either fighter.

[Lords Gym]

using logic , one would think Ali would have been right in the thick of it .

[El Kabong]

Liston and Foreman Slow and powerful with 0 defense.... Tyson was Explosive with speed and power with nice compact punches along with superb head movement and ability to slip a punch quite easily.

Patterson was to small lacked chin and didnt have the physical presence or power of Mike

Remeber Tyson had an Excellent chin and could absorb a great deal of punishment....

#1 Foreman had one hell of a chin

#2 1990's Tyson didn't bob and weave and have great defense

#3 Patterson was just as fast, Liston was just as strong





.....Tyson's weakness was between his ears and in his chest and not in his style or skill

[babyboNe]

ali still becomes greatest of all time in much easier fashion without the political issues he stays focus on boxing and reaches an even greater level.

without him going to jail just continued with boxing all boxing in his life without the other hardships he delt with, ali destroys the 90s heavyweight.

[Mintymen]

Ali was robbed some of his best years and still was considered the greatest. Figure that out

[Majesty]

I just think it would be harder for Ali not being the biggest as he was throughout his career.....vs Frazier, Foreman, Liston.....Ali was ALWAYS the biggest

Alright, Terrel was 6'5.

You see what Ali did to him?

[DaxxKahn]

Liston and Foreman Slow and powerful with 0 defense.... Tyson was Explosive with speed and power with nice compact punches along with superb head movement and ability to slip a punch quite easily.

Patterson was to small lacked chin and didnt have the physical presence or power of Mike

Remeber Tyson had an Excellent chin and could absorb a great deal of punishment....

#1 Foreman had one hell of a chin

#2 1990's Tyson didn't bob and weave and have great defense

#3 Patterson was just as fast, Liston was just as strong





.....Tyson's weakness was between his ears and in his chest and not in his style or skill

CC#1025