Re: Should Bush and Blair be tried for war crimes?

Originally Posted by
Nameless
they signed the Geneva Convention and that according to them, they can be trialed, especially as most of their wrong doing isn't even related to what they did with the terrorists/rebels, the uniform for the ennemies is irrelevant to the fact that they did wage a fake war, being responsible for the demise of millions of innocents including more than 500 000 innocent children. If seriously somebody thinks we can't trial them, it's like saying that the government can get away with whatever they want, even based on a lie because they are the government. if it's true, I'll become prime minister of Canada and I'll go claim by force something, whatever it is, I'll carpet bomb everyone on that island to save as many canadian soldier's life as possible and fuck for the innocent victims because anyway, collateral damage happens. And what if people don't like it? Well, if Blair and Bush couldn't be trial for an illegal war just like I do and for being responsible for the death of 500 000 children plus countless civilians, why would I? It's all about private interests and being the prime minister/president to have the authority to go an get it.
You keep bringing this up but your article specifically states that the embargo is a result of the UN and since 1991. So I guess every leader of every nation in the UN that voted for the sanctions is a war criminal?
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Bookmarks