Seems to be many votes for Holyfield Lewis 1...
+1.
Seems to be many votes for Holyfield Lewis 1...
+1.
Wilfedo Vasquez V's Carlos Rios. The worst decision of all time.Originally Posted by brazilianbomber
Lewis V Holyfield 1....Lewis clearly won this fight, i had it 116-112 ! Result Draw
Lewis v Holyfield 2....Holyfield clearly won this fight, i had it 117-111 ! Result Lewis UD
I had Lewis winning both fights, but the second one by a smaller margin.Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN
Yeah Lewis won bothOriginally Posted by ChuckNorris
When I think of the biggets robberies I think of Barrera - Morales 1 and Lewis- Holyfield 1 . Both were avenged so its all good
what about Holyfield getting robbed in the olympics
or Roy Jones getting robbed in the Olympics
ORIGINAL MEMBER OF THE DREADED AND MUCH FEARED CIRCLE OF TRUST (CoT)Hidden Content
Inventor of Who Are You
Max Schmeling-Jack Sharkey II
Kid Diamond - Miguel Angel Huerta
most of sven ottke world titles wins...
De la hoya v sturm...
So by your scoring 2nd fight was even more of robbery than the 1st ?? no way bro.Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN
Robin Reid vs Sven Ottke comes to mindOriginally Posted by Preme
![]()
reid, brewer, johnson, mitchel... and some of them on more than one ocasion...Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
always wondered why at some point the ABC organisations didnt step in ad sort something out, a netural ground or something coz thee were numerous ottke fights that it was without question he lost... i mean we are not tlaking about close fights - full out and out clear cut everysingle person who aint one of his fan boys would swear down it was a loss...
For what it's worth, Larry Merchant was asked once to name the worst decision he'd ever seen, and he said it was a tie between Whitaker-Chavez and Lewis-Holyifeld I.
I always thought Ottke was a fraud he should have atleast 3 losses he had decent skills but overall was a fraud imo and was lucky to have judges and ref on his side he was scared shitless of Calzaghe aswell i know Calzaghe hasn't fought best opposition but atleast he beats them convincly all except 1 out of 40+ fights.Originally Posted by Preme
All I can say is that the word "robbery" is over used in the sport of boxing. It no longer carries the weight that it should due to the fans voice being louder at times than it should be.
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
I don't really blame ottke tho... and i'm not certain it was he who was scared of joe...Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
sven had very very good skills i thought, he was just small and had NO power a all, it was alays going to hold him back when most of the guys he fought had very good power and could box...
The thing with ottke was he was love din germany, and germany are massive about their boxing, so he would fight 3-4 imes a year and get paid a shit load for it... he wouldn;t ofbeen alowed to leav germany even if he wnated to, and he was never going to be able to fight calzaghe even if he wanted to, no judge in the world would of given him the win that night, joe was to good and would of won it out right, prolly stopped him then to as sven would never of been able to hurt him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks