I'm not bashing Roy and I'm not even saying that Bernard deserves to now rank higher on the all time p4p list than Roy, but I think he at least deserves to be even with him for these reasons. Even though Roy won belts in 4 divisions and Hopkins only won in 2, Bernard became the undisputed champ of both divisions, while Roy only was undisputed at one weight class, light heavyweight (and some even question that for his not fighting Dariusz). Next, when Roy got his @ss kicked, he was mentally destroyed and unable to overcome it, whereas Hopkins loses 2 close fights, moves up, and dominates Tarver (all at the age of 41 mind you). Hopkins has also never come remotely close to being stopped or KO'd. Even though Roy beat him we all know Bernard was too green at that time. I do blame him though just as much as Roy for there not being a rematch because they're both stubborn. Roy also is far and away the better athlete with more natural ability, but I think Bernard evens that out with his superior toughness and technical skill that is second to no one.