I would like to hear the logic behind the most illogic B.S I have ever heard but yet it has always been said in boxing....... "you have to damn near kill the champion to get the win". Theoretically if J.T landed 2 punches per round and Winky landed 3. Then Winky did more BUT NOT ENOUGH TO WIN!.......... When they should be saying" J.T didn't do enough to keep his titles "..So basically in boxing the champion comes in with 2 points already on-the cards....Maybe we need to adapt this judging method in more sports.In football if the game is a no scoring game but the challengers score at the end from a safety or a field goal.....yeah they have more points "BUT they didn't do enough TO WIN"! I'm sure they'd love that in soccer and especially baseball. Even J.T knew he didn't win that fight .Lots of fighters would have faked it at the final bell and smiled and threw their hands in the air.J.T is much to much of a gentleman . He basically admitted that the judging was unfair by saying "I don't have nothing to do with how they scored the fight".He knew the other man did MORE. But in boxing-More is only More-and more sometimes isn't Enough!