The question asked for someone he "truthfully beat"--not someone over whom he was GIFTED a ridiculous decision. Try this: Valuev shouldn't be on a top 10 list because he couldn't even beat Ruiz.Originally Posted by Memphis
The question asked for someone he "truthfully beat"--not someone over whom he was GIFTED a ridiculous decision. Try this: Valuev shouldn't be on a top 10 list because he couldn't even beat Ruiz.Originally Posted by Memphis
Valuev beat Ruiz fair and square, anyone with half a mind could see that.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Even if we remove Ruiz from his record he makes the list. Briggs makes it having gone on a winning streak against bums, not my words. Valuev has been on a winning streak for years, that must be better than Briggs? Or is it that Briggs just happens to be fighting Lyle's boy Wlad?
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Every single commentator I've read disagrees. As does the editorial staff at The Ring, who even went so far as to keep Ruiz ranked several spots above Valuev.Originally Posted by Memphis
So Valuev is good enough for the Ring top ten. Im going to assume that Briggs and Austin aren't?
No?
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
I'm not disagreeing with you there at all. As I said before, I think this whole exercise is difficult/meaningless since all of these guys are really really terrible and could always lose their next fight (as every single beltholder in the division did within the past 6 months).Originally Posted by Memphis
Fair enough mate, in truth its just me digging at Lyle, he hates Valuev with a passion
Have aon me
![]()
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Back atcha.Originally Posted by Memphis
I can't say I wouldn't love to see Valuev KO'd though--it would be fun to see someone that big hit the canvas.
Eh, could be...at least Shannon is stepping up his competition and unlike Valuev he's trying to accomplish something for the division.Originally Posted by Memphis
Shannon brings SOMETHING to the table other than being big and ugly whereas Valuev does not
For me it has to be Williams from that list, the guy wasn't even ranked to start with then lost to Skelton who was also unranked. Everyone else there has compete with better competition, cept Sultan but he's still undefeated.
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
You forgot the belt Valuev brings to the table.Originally Posted by Lyle
Hope this helps (it wont)
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
I would be inclined to agree with you. No one else except Oleg has stepped up.....Rahman is not even top 10 anymore.....Originally Posted by shza
It feels good to be back home.
The belt is what you make of it and defenses vs Owen Beck and Monte Barrett make the WBA belt worth jack shitOriginally Posted by Memphis
At least Wlad is fighting someone remotely dangerous
Rahman fought Maskaev obviously he's dangerous
Lyakhovich hasn't been seen or heard of since beating Brewster
Dont shift the goalposts, if Briggs and Austin are in, Valuev should be. You know Im right![]()
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks