I used Hatton as a comparison to his nearest rival....and I don't see excuses for poor performances,those are facts..where is there an excuse? He went down to a guy with 98%KO ratio and it was a push,where's the excuse in there?it's a FACT!
As for what guys has he faced that are P4P,if you read properly,I said that he needs the big name and the only fighters that are P4P are around him are Hatton who is a weight class lower and Floyd,who's busy. If that is all you use to define what a good fighter,if he's beaten somone P4P then you must hardly like any boxers....
And I don't understand what you are saying,if it's that you have not seen Cotto perform well,then I'm sorry but that is a load of BS. Like I said,all those guys he fought are good,decent fighters with excellent records,heck P4P PBF has fought 2-3 of them himself!!
Cotto is a young fighter,great talent,has fought good opposition and has a good future ahead of him.He is being brought up slowly and I agree he needs a big name but the ones you mentioned:
Gatti(prob retires)
Hatton(at 140,COTTO IS AT 147)
PBF(busy)
Baldo(Cotto's camp spoke to,he decided to fight PBF)
Margarito(no one with a reputation on the line wants to fight the Tijuana Tornado and Arum wouldn't make this fight!)
Mosley(taking rest of the year off)
You have not pointed out a single thing that is over rated,all I hear is who has he beat P4P,is that all your argument is? That's weak.
Bookmarks