Fair, and your opinion.....but why is Hopkins not fighting Kessler and Calzaghe? Why was Hopkins always fighting at home while Monson was always fighting abroad?....Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
umm no. just noOriginally Posted by feltmarskallen
To be honest, I decided years ago, that I will never put my money in a criminal's pocket as Hopkins. His entire regime he has tried to put his forehead on his opponents ditto to make damage. Hopkins is a girl and should fight an European top fighter instead of fighting falling stars of the US - Hopkins could beat DLH, Tito, Tarver but so could Sturm - Could Hopkins beat Kessler and Calzaghe? I am very sure that he would get a boxing lesson as DLH got against Sturm but Hopkins has NO desire to fight prime fighters. He is F****** low class and a former criminal....Originally Posted by AdamGB
If you're a boxing fan there's nothing boring about watching to tactilely brilliant fighters who know the game inside out boxing is there?Originally Posted by feltmarskallen
Sorry Adam, I forgot that the real purists (all with the real boxing knowledge as you) want boring fights and us spring chickens only goes after the primitive KO fights. I will spend my 50 on another fight - Enjoy your fight :-D -- even it is not so highly purist as yours....I will spend my money on Kessler vs. Andrade :-DOriginally Posted by AdamGB
Go away.Originally Posted by feltmarskallen
Two boring and overrated fighters. I don’t care with this fight.
Depends which parts of boxing you find interesting... if it's only when leather hits a rib or a skull then you're missing out...
no for all the reasons your neglecting to mention in the paragraph of fanboyism that you tried to pass off as a post.
Bookmarks