not really words I would use in the same sentence.Originally Posted by tysonbruno
not really words I would use in the same sentence.Originally Posted by tysonbruno
CC Missy on 10 000 posts![]()
lol how long did that take you ?Originally Posted by Missy
it took her over 3 years and congrats missyOriginally Posted by Tam Seddon
![]()
The answer is there for everyone to see.....
The fight was offered to Naz and it was turned down.....
It's quite simple really.....![]()
Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.
Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.
Barrera vs Naz wern't really beatdown it was quite even first 6 rounds and Barrera only won by 3 points but i do agree Morales and Marquez would both fight smart against Naz and win a decisionOriginally Posted by tysonbruno
Back in the time JMM wanted to fight him I wouldn't have been surprised if Marquez did just enough to lose(like against Norwood)
I respect your opinion very much as anyone here but Morales had the style that Hamed would have loved to fight.Originally Posted by SweetPea
So are you saying that Hamed would have beaten Morales?Originally Posted by Majesty
here to watch it then.Originally Posted by tysonbruno
[youtube=425,350]GKQC6b14vx0[/youtube]
Naz was never in the fight.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Even?
3 points?
And people question the judges in Vegas, never in this world.
OMG I posted in my own joke thread![]()
Barrera wern't really throwing much first 6 rounds i watched it years ago and i thought Naz got pretty much beat down but watching it again recently first 6 rounds i was quite surprised it was quite even i had Barrera up 4 points but he had point deducted in 12th so i had him winning by 3 roundsOriginally Posted by Missy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks