Cool. Who is Huge McElvenney?Originally Posted by Scrap
Cool. Who is Huge McElvenney?Originally Posted by Scrap
CC. Go for it man. Be warned though, it is not a good or entertaining fight, because Spinks just refuses to engage at all. He gets knocked down three times though, which I'd say 2, 1 for sure is a legit knockdown that is not scored. Plus that damn ref took I believe 2 points away from Mayorga. It was a screwjob if I've ever seen one. And it is a perfect example of one guy running from his opponent all night long.Originally Posted by El Gamo
"You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"
I think so. Corey Spinks isnt a boxer that i think runs a lot, he boxer Mayorga for the most part and would have been stupid to stand and trade with him. SRL ran when he fought Duran the second time because even though he was winning some rounds he was still fighting at Durans pace. RJJ vs Johnson is a perfect example of runningOriginally Posted by El Gamo
Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle
Probably the best sports writer there is, try and get hold of some of his books worth a read, his discriptive verse is wonderfull.
Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....
boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training
Originally Posted by Hulk
CC back man,I'll check it out.
YEAH,Tthats what I mean. Hulk,wouldn't Spinks have been stupid to stand for too long??Was he throwing punches??Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Thanks for that,I'll search him! Have a cc on me for the info!Originally Posted by Scrap
Its not running if you win the round...period.
Have one yourself cc
Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....
boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training
Ill agree to disagreeOriginally Posted by Olympian904
Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle
A "PURE BOXER" in my estimation has done well with the art of hitting and not getting hit, if that requires moving around the ring, then that's what it takes.
If this style of fighting bothers you then I suggest you start a petition for a 5' x 5' ring.
If a strong fighter is unable to cut off the ring, then his power is useless.
What makes boxing interesting to me is seeing how the different styles do against each other.
There are styles that do well against certain other styles.
Using the ring is not necessarily running, just my opinion of couse
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Someone who won't engage for the entire 3 minutes, someone not attempting to be at all impressive, there's nothing wrong with not getting hit, but someone who doesn't throw combinations, their intent is primarily not being hit, rathjer than landing effective punches, someone who basically is boring the crap out of everyone, not trying to land shots, do damage, scared of scratching a nail, getting their hair out of place. I mean, everyone can tell the difference between skill, dominating, and being a bitch.
Remember the good old days, we miss you Marco!
Elaborate! What does that mean? So if a fighter avoids contact for the whole 3 mintues,that's fine is it? Like Oscar v Tito?Originally Posted by Olympian904
Running is a crude term. Plus for me its usually an accumilation of things.
But id say a fighter "ran" if he:
(counting down)
5- Constantly leads then backs off
4- Constantly counters and backs off
3- Constantly breaks off from exchanges 1st
2- Does't give any lateral movement untill he touches the ropes
1- Is clearly throwing less punches than usual
A fighter would probably need to do 3 or 4 of those things before i would call it "running".
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
I don't mean to answer for Olympian, but he said it's not running if you win the round.Originally Posted by El Gamo
When Oscar ran the last 3 rounds, he wasn't winning them.
Alot used to say Pernell Whitaker but thats where there wrong because Whitaker did throw in punching range and take a chance and win the round
Running in a fight is when you take no chance or no attempt to win a fight and i've seen some boxers do so much running they should be 100 m runner
Take Green vs Miranda Green took no chance only when he caught Miranda with punch and floored him and even after that he didn't even try and finish the job Green took no risks and run all night to survive that imo is perfect example of running and survival.
Ok..hmm...how would you know if you've won the round? What if a fighter has landed a few punches at the beginning then avoids contact for the rest of the round?Originally Posted by SweetPea
Pernel...running? No way!!!!Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks