Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    340
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    998
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    4. Trinidad: hard puncher, proven he couldn't beat the very best, but looked more impressive than them against quality opponents.
    Actually Trinidad beat OLDH, and OLDH made half of his legend beating up opponents Tito had already ruined. And he still didn't look as good as Tito doing it.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000




    Trinidad had the best run in my opinion. Controversial or not he recieved the decision vs De La Hoya. He then went on to beat David Ried, Thiam, Vargas, Joppy all in back to back fights. That was the most impressive run out of any of the boxers at the time, I have to go with Tito on this one despite his over ambitious plans to conquer 160

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by brazilianbomber



    Trinidad had the best run in my opinion. Controversial or not he recieved the decision vs De La Hoya. He then went on to beat David Ried, Thiam, Vargas, Joppy all in back to back fights. That was the most impressive run out of any of the boxers at the time, I have to go with Tito on this one despite his over ambitious plans to conquer 160
    Actually his plan was even more ambitious. He wanted to chalange Roy Jones Jr after Hopkins. He most likely would've lost that fight but, man what an event that would've been.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
    Quote Originally Posted by brazilianbomber



    Trinidad had the best run in my opinion. Controversial or not he recieved the decision vs De La Hoya. He then went on to beat David Ried, Thiam, Vargas, Joppy all in back to back fights. That was the most impressive run out of any of the boxers at the time, I have to go with Tito on this one despite his over ambitious plans to conquer 160
    Actually his plan was even more ambitious. He wanted to chalange Roy Jones Jr after Hopkins. He most likely would've lost that fight but, man what an event that would've been.
    Trinidad is my second favorite fighter of all time behind Pernell Whitaker, I followed his career with an obsession and remember the plans he had. He set his goal to fight Roy Jones after he defeated David Ried. Everybody was skeptical about the plan until he destroyed Joppy at 160. Everybody thought Hopkins was going to be an easy warm up for the RJJ fight but Hopkins was simply to big and strong for Tito, he was not a true MW. But if victorious they were planning to hold the fight in Football stadium, that maybe would have sold more PPV's than the fight we have on saturday, Jones would have murdered him but it was a win win situation for Tito, Hopkins was not a win win for Tito in any stretch of the imagination, people still cruicify him for his loss to Hopkins till this day despite a huge size disadvantage.










  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1603
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Hopkins, Wright, Mosley, Forest, Oscar, & as much as I hate to say their names Tito & Vargas were all tip top back in the day.
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Hopkins, Wright, Mosley, Forest, Oscar, & as much as I hate to say their names Tito & Vargas were all tip top back in the day.
    This list was accurate with the exception of Forrest, his greatness was shortlived, Mayorga ended his career as a big money fighter. Everybody else on this list enjoyed long periods of sucsess including Vargas who scored victories over Wright (Controversial) and Quartey, not including a fierce title defense against Tito where he came up short.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1497
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    1. Winky: Beats Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, ODLH, and maybe even Hopkins prime for prime. He beat Trinidad, Quartey, Vargas, Mosley twice, Jermain Taylor, and a whole slew of good or great fighters.
    2. B-Hop: He only gets the edge prime for prime over Winky due to size. However I still say he beats the rest, and he was a true fundamentalist of the sport even though he is a little more unorthodox than people give him credit for... I've hardly ever seen a guy catch somebody like he did Tarver so many times looking at the ground.
    3. ODLH. went 1-1 against Mosey, Beat Trinidad, fought Chavez and Whitaker, Beat Vargas more impressively IMO than Trinidad, IMO squeezed by Quartey, Gave Hopkins a good fight at middleweight until the size differential kicked in.
    4. Trinidad: hard puncher, proven he couldn't beat the very best, but looked more impressive than them against quality opponents.
    6. Mosley: Godly fast, and amazingly powerful for his size, but he wasn't all that great at 147 and up... Without his overwhelming power like he had at 135 he wasn't the best boxer, and he had the Meldrick Taylor complex where he always has to bang with the opponent even when its failed him.
    Ike Quartey: amazing fighter who was the only one I've seen to truly hurt Oscar, and he knocked him down first. But his fight with Vargas puts him behind Mosley.
    Tito could and did fight and beat the best!
    And winky beat him at middleweight.. So that's not really sticking to the topic of best of the new millenium in the separate weight classes!
    The best guy I saw Trinidad beat was Vargas... who alot of other guys beat as well. I didn't read the topic carefully enough... my bad I thought it was 90's and 2000's

    In this case
    Hopkins
    ODLH/Mosley
    Trinidad
    rest

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    Quote Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    1. Winky: Beats Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, ODLH, and maybe even Hopkins prime for prime. He beat Trinidad, Quartey, Vargas, Mosley twice, Jermain Taylor, and a whole slew of good or great fighters.
    2. B-Hop: He only gets the edge prime for prime over Winky due to size. However I still say he beats the rest, and he was a true fundamentalist of the sport even though he is a little more unorthodox than people give him credit for... I've hardly ever seen a guy catch somebody like he did Tarver so many times looking at the ground.
    3. ODLH. went 1-1 against Mosey, Beat Trinidad, fought Chavez and Whitaker, Beat Vargas more impressively IMO than Trinidad, IMO squeezed by Quartey, Gave Hopkins a good fight at middleweight until the size differential kicked in.
    4. Trinidad: hard puncher, proven he couldn't beat the very best, but looked more impressive than them against quality opponents.
    6. Mosley: Godly fast, and amazingly powerful for his size, but he wasn't all that great at 147 and up... Without his overwhelming power like he had at 135 he wasn't the best boxer, and he had the Meldrick Taylor complex where he always has to bang with the opponent even when its failed him.
    Ike Quartey: amazing fighter who was the only one I've seen to truly hurt Oscar, and he knocked him down first. But his fight with Vargas puts him behind Mosley.
    Tito could and did fight and beat the best!
    And winky beat him at middleweight.. So that's not really sticking to the topic of best of the new millenium in the separate weight classes!
    The best guy I saw Trinidad beat was Vargas... who alot of other guys beat as well. I didn't read the topic carefully enough... my bad I thought it was 90's and 2000's

    In this case
    Hopkins
    ODLH/Mosley
    Trinidad
    rest
    Hmm... So who was the best guy DLH officially beat?

    About the topic. I should have been more specific I guess. I ment who was the best in general from around 97 to 2003 which is more or less when they were all in their primes amd fighting eachother.

    I also asked who would win in a tournament at 147, 154 and 160. Not necessarilly who was the best at each weight class. For example if you believe Hopkins would win all three turnaments, that is a valid response even though Hopkins never faught lower than 160.

    Lets talk about reccords for a wile though. Who do you think has the best all around quality of opposition.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1497
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Officialy is bullshit, but he beat Whitaker officially at the lower weights, and so did Trinidad, but it was a different Whitaker. Also Oscar beats Vargas like Trinidad, He beat most of the same guys officially, but HE DID beat Trinidad... you can't win 9 rounds run 3 and lose the fight because you ran 3 rounds. I don't think he actually won 9 rounds but it was close. He also later beat Mosley IMO, and that of many. He beat Chavez. He didn't get his ass kicked as bad from Hopkins(though Hopkins wasn't as good as when he fought Trinidad).

    At 147
    I think it would be between Oscar and Mosley
    at 154
    Winky:Oscar
    160
    Bernard:Winky

    I think Winky would still be up there but in terms of what he had done up to this point wasn't enough. Nobody even hardly knew who he was in the early 2000's.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1135
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    And nobody want to fight his poor ass

    He is strong and a great boxer. who is more drama Queen JT or Winky?
    Que Viva Puerto Rico
    Hidden Content

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,449
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1018
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    During that time I go with Tito. Only reason he edges the others is simply because he made the most noise.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    i would say Shane was the best at this time.


    Bhop might be the best but for some reason he just doesn't fit with that group of guys at that period. he kinda just stayed to himself at 160. winky was also good but not nearly as relevant at that time as the other fighters mention on the thread.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    Officialy is bullshit, but he beat Whitaker officially at the lower weights, and so did Trinidad, but it was a different Whitaker. Also Oscar beats Vargas like Trinidad, He beat most of the same guys officially, but HE DID beat Trinidad... you can't win 9 rounds run 3 and lose the fight because you ran 3 rounds. I don't think he actually won 9 rounds but it was close. He also later beat Mosley IMO, and that of many. He beat Chavez. He didn't get his a** kicked as bad from Hopkins(though Hopkins wasn't as good as when he fought Trinidad).

    At 147
    I think it would be between Oscar and Mosley
    at 154
    Winky:Oscar
    160
    Bernard:Winky

    I think Winky would still be up there but in terms of what he had done up to this point wasn't enough. Nobody even hardly knew who he was in the early 2000's.
    Officially is bullshit I have a problem with this statement. Boxing, like we all know, is very different than other sports. The scoring is very much subjective to the people doing the scoring. Except for a knock down or point penalty there is no specific event for which you automatically get points. But, unless you want professional boxing to have same scoring as the armatures, which I think most would agree would be disastrous, this is in fact a good thing. Why? Because there is absolutely no way to quantify how much more damage one punch did versus another. However, we can't have one guy make such a subjective decision so it was decided to have three people decide. What they say is what goes. We may not agree with them, but those are the rules in this sport that we all love. Officially is what's in the reccord books and officially is not bullshit.
    Unless of course you are suggesting foul play and that the judges were corrupted.

    I'm sorry I don't think its fair to say that DLH beat Tito like if it was a fact any more than it is fair for me to say that Quartey or Sturm beat DLH. It is not a fact. It is a fact that many people do not agree with what you say. It is a fact that out of the three professional judges scoring the fight (4 if you count Ledderman) not one of them saw DLH win the fight.

    Now if you say that you believe DLH is better than Tito because you believe that DLH did enough to win the fight then I respect your opinion and I am glad to hear what you think on the subject. All five mentioned are great fighters and I honestly believe that if they all fought eachother 10 times each one of them would win at least 3 or 4.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1274
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who was the best from 147 to 160 in the late 90s early 2000

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    Quote Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth
    1. Winky: Beats Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, ODLH, and maybe even Hopkins prime for prime. He beat Trinidad, Quartey, Vargas, Mosley twice, Jermain Taylor, and a whole slew of good or great fighters.
    2. B-Hop: He only gets the edge prime for prime over Winky due to size. However I still say he beats the rest, and he was a true fundamentalist of the sport even though he is a little more unorthodox than people give him credit for... I've hardly ever seen a guy catch somebody like he did Tarver so many times looking at the ground.
    3. ODLH. went 1-1 against Mosey, Beat Trinidad, fought Chavez and Whitaker, Beat Vargas more impressively IMO than Trinidad, IMO squeezed by Quartey, Gave Hopkins a good fight at middleweight until the size differential kicked in.
    4. Trinidad: hard puncher, proven he couldn't beat the very best, but looked more impressive than them against quality opponents.
    6. Mosley: Godly fast, and amazingly powerful for his size, but he wasn't all that great at 147 and up... Without his overwhelming power like he had at 135 he wasn't the best boxer, and he had the Meldrick Taylor complex where he always has to bang with the opponent even when its failed him.
    Ike Quartey: amazing fighter who was the only one I've seen to truly hurt Oscar, and he knocked him down first. But his fight with Vargas puts him behind Mosley.
    Tito could and did fight and beat the best!
    And winky beat him at middleweight.. So that's not really sticking to the topic of best of the new millenium in the separate weight classes!
    The best guy I saw Trinidad beat was Vargas... who alot of other guys beat as well. I didn't read the topic carefully enough... my bad I thought it was 90's and 2000's

    In this case
    Hopkins
    ODLH/Mosley
    Trinidad
    rest
    Nahh..Lol

    The best person you saw him beat was Oscar ..

    In my opinion its like this..Oscar proves he was the better fighter..
    Oscar is the better fighter of the two..But he did loose the fight..

    Imo..Even though not good for the fans.. It worked for both fighters..Oscar was impressive..And my man won..So its good for me
    Immortal Technique

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing