I completely disagree, I felt this encouraged Marquez because he knew he'd been dealt a break, thus performed better because of it.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
I completely disagree, I felt this encouraged Marquez because he knew he'd been dealt a break, thus performed better because of it.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Reid got robbed in this fight. The referee was a fucking disgrace. The IBF should have been ashamed of themselves for appointing him and the thieving judges. As Reid said after the fight "At least Dick Turpin wore a mask when he robbed people"Originally Posted by BIG H
Yeah!Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
It seems like it was decided that Augustus has lost the fight before it even began.
Didn't Williams have an odd point deduction in his Tyson fight too?
I'll have to check my tapes again. I don't quite remember what happened, but I think he had an odd point deduction in his fight against Tyson. I just remember it seems the ref wanted Tyson to win that fight so badly.
I would go with firstly..Jay nady deducting a point and no knockdown to barrera agaist marquez..
And secondly..What do you know..Jay Nady again..
Felix Trinidad vs Fernando Vargas when he sent trinidad to the corner and to talk to him for five minutes before finally deducting a point having spoke to him for a fair while.. Like lederman said.. You dont speak to a guy for five minutes and then decide to deduct a point..If its worthy of a point deduction then you send him to the corner and deduct a point immediately
Immortal Technique
Out of the options, I'll have to go with Camacho. Deducting a point because someone doesn't want to touch gloves IS RETARDED.
David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King
He also got deducted a point after being floored for the first time by lacy from a blatantly ilegal shotOriginally Posted by BIG H
YesOriginally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
For spinning out against Burton? That was a joke. The whole fight was a joke.Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
Didnt Burton win by a split when the judges actually had it as a majority? Jokers!
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
YES, more of a disgrace. God awful decision. Emanual then crunched Burton in the rematch. Ah, sweet revenge.Originally Posted by Jimboogie
Recently,I'd say some of the deuctions for Miranda v Abraham for supposed low blows. From what I remember,they were totally legit bodyshots.
Yup . Nady has always been an awful ref but that night he was just plain ridiculous . Unfortunatley we had blind judges that night also so the whole thing was a farceOriginally Posted by bzkfn
Originally Posted by bzkfn
I felt the same way!!!!!
Thats not what happened at all. Haugen would not touch Camacho's gloves. While the ref was lecturing Haugen about touching gloves, Camacho reached over an punched Haugen in the face. How is that a bad point deduction?Originally Posted by Beanflicker
I guess Nady is noit the most popular referee here, eh?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks