Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Quote Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Quote Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
    I think Naz would have stopped Morales without to much trouble i remember watching Injin Chi giving him some trouble and shuck him a few times and i think a better prepared Naz would have beaten Barrera
    Giving him bit a trouble and giving him load of trouble is totally different Naz had trouble alot of trouble with Kelley Medina ect Morales would of beat Naz his style was even better suited to beat Naz than it was for Barrera.
    No way would Morales be able to take Naz's power
    He wouldn't have to because he would box on outside like Barrera and outbox Naz.
    but don't forget naz was a lefty...but had power in both hands and you saw what pac did to morrales and after seeing the second and third fights...i think pacman had a good argue ment that morrales only won the first because of the gloves...because when wore his punchers glove he stopped morrales twice...

    anyway prince's lefty style mayhave posed a prob for EM
    Morales vs Pac is totally different Pac moves side to side comes right at you Naz holds his hands down and waits for openings Pac doesn't Naz has been shook so many times in his career and i hate to say it but he never really fought top level opponent mostly domestic fighters hell even Ingle almost had Naz in 10th round of there fight.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

    come on.. naz looked good against guys who just wasnt elite, his trainer said he didnt want marquez, and instead went for barrera..

    i really think that those hyping up naz, saying, well morales this and morales that, should take a deep breath.. cause this is simply ,a bad excuse, as bad as it gets..

    morales, barrera and marquez are as bad as they come in boxing, skills, chin and heart, all of them warriors and able to take punches,, that is simply not up for discussion.. ..

    if naz was such a great fighter, then he would have adapted to barrera style, and tried to do something, but he just wasnt skilled enough to do so..

    honestly the 3 mentioned was just a class above naz..

    naz simply just didnt cut against the elite, morales, barrera and marquez would all beat a prime naz..


  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1140
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

    that's right he didn't i forgot about that..but then he did retire after that or soon after..if he really felt the gloves made a difference he would have kept fighting and demanded a rematch after a few wins to prove it was the gloves..i.e. PACMAN v MOrrales...
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1140
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: IF MORRALES fought Hamed before Barrera would it be the same?

    Quote Originally Posted by greatdane
    come on.. naz looked good against guys who just wasnt elite, his trainer said he didnt want marquez, and instead went for barrera..

    i really think that those hyping up naz, saying, well morales this and morales that, should take a deep breath.. cause this is simply ,a bad excuse, as bad as it gets..

    morales, barrera and marquez are as bad as they come in boxing, skills, chin and heart, all of them warriors and able to take punches,, that is simply not up for discussion.. ..

    if naz was such a great fighter, then he would have adapted to barrera style, and tried to do something, but he just wasnt skilled enough to do so..

    honestly the 3 mentioned was just a class above naz..

    naz simply just didnt cut against the elite morales, barrera and marquez would all beat a prime naz..

    so then naz is like delahoya...
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing