Shouldn't it be the big 3 (WBC, WBA & IBF) instead? Ring magazine doesn't even acknowledge the WBO.Originally Posted by superheavyrhun
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Shouldn't it be the big 3 (WBC, WBA & IBF) instead? Ring magazine doesn't even acknowledge the WBO.Originally Posted by superheavyrhun
Array
cc for the effort...
i disagree w/ the ko% though
r. marquez, cotto, pac, mosely, would be rated in alot of top five p4p lists if mayweather stayed retired and mosely was more active..
Array
Wow great job!!
"But of course, there is more to a record than wins, so here's the wins divided by defeats of their opponents, so the higher the number, the better win/defeat ratio of their opponents.
Floyd Mayweather Jr – 5.76
Jermain Taylor – 5.62
Miguel Cotto – 4.92
Manny Pacquiao – 4.70
Bernard Hopkins – 4.67
Shane Mosley – 4.59
Juan Manuel Marquez – 4.15
Joe Calzaghe – 3.15
Rafael Marquez – 2.93
Ronald Winky Wright – 2.89"
Was just thinking though could this not also mean that the fighters they faced had fought nobodys and therefore had a higher number of wins??
“If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize.” Muhammad Ali.
Statistics doesn't mean anything. They could have been fighting bums the whole time. I'd rather judge on my boxing reactions.
Array
Very possibly...but then again I confess I have never read a copy of Ring magazine, so I wouldn't know that fact.Originally Posted by Violent Demise
And as for the numbers, they are just that, one of the reason that Jermain Taylor came out very well was that he was fighting guys with decent journeymen records much earlier in his career than some of the other fighters, who were still picking up 0-2-0 guys 10 fights in. And indeed, that could mean that they've fought a lot of guys with padded records, but then again it's a sport not a numbers game as you mentioned, it's just the numbers are an interesting aspect of it, at least to my mind.
Your boxing reactions have led you to believe that Mundine is the third ranked SMW in the world....for now I'll go on the stats.Originally Posted by chum112
![]()
Array
I bet Pongsaklek will rival him!Originally Posted by Bilbo
Array
Maybe looking at things from another perspective will help you see that Anthony Mundine isn't the world's best fighter.Originally Posted by chum112
![]()
Stats can be easily manipulated. You can be a multiple weight champ like Floyd,skim through the divisions and pick and choose who to fight or you can be a Whitaker,fight everyone,unify,clean them out.
THe win vs. loss of opponents though counteracts over protected fighters.Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
Array
Super-cool click to you. Great job!!Originally Posted by superheavyrhun
Originally Posted by Taeth
Sorry, you lost me here.
I think the one thing that shows how good a guy is if his fights agains world class fighters, meaning what is their reccord against world class fighters. The problem is how do you rate a fighter as World Class? So again I would suggest their reccord against former and current world champions.
WOW,sorry,Superheavy,I was lazy and did not read the first page. You worked this out yourself?? Thats awesome stuff man! Have a CC on me.
Nice one fella and i agree that PBF is the best P4P in the world currently with Pacman second and Wright 3rd in my books!
Array
Wow. I never put a lot into boxing statistics whether it be record, win percentage or whatever but that is certainly compelling stuff. Fantastic. CC.
Array
How about a list of the fighters whov fought the most past and present champs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks