Whoever lands first.
Whoever lands first.
Dude you seriously need to stop playing "Fight Night".Originally Posted by mayorook
Felix wouldnt last 1 round with Jackson , who for me is the hardest puncher who ever lived. he was faster than felix also
Well i wouldn't go that far but i would pick Jackson in 5th round of a slugfest.Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
No it wouldn't Jackson was past his best when he fought Gerald and Trinidad is nothing like Gerald at all Tito gets caught early this has happened alot in his career Jackson by KO in 3 rounds or 5.Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
Tito best weight was at Welter but he was very destructive at Super welter too. He beat an unbeaten Vargas and Reid who both may have out boxed Julian Jackson. Remember McCallum beat Jackson so it was possible to stop him and Tito could do that. So at light middle I go for Tito and at Middle I go for? do not know..
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Usually i agree with you, but in this arguement we couldnt be more different. Vargas could never have outboxed Julian Jackson, nor could reid i think. To compare Reid and VARGAS to Mike McCallum in my book is near blasphemous. Vargas was a good prospect, but he is not/was not and never will be a great, he will be forgotten among the other talents of his era.Originally Posted by Master
091
You really do not rate Vargas do you but it is a debate for another thread.
I never intended to compare Vargas and Reid to McCallum, sorry, all I was saying was Julian Jackson was beatable and Tito was good enough to do it. It would be a hell of a fight.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
All throughout his career i hated Vargas. But grudgingly i respected him as a good fighter. However i dont rate him as a memorable or great fighter no. He showed great heart, resiliance and courage against Trinidad, but that was really his crowning glory. So i must correct myself, he may go down in history. But only as a boxer remembered for a glorious failure.Originally Posted by Master
Jackson was indeed beatable, Gerald McClellan demonstrated that.
P4P tito may have beaten him. But in reality Jackson was a much bigger man.
One thing we agree on, it WOULD have been a hell of a fight!
091
CC well put.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Make no mistake, Jackson was a punching monster. I personally think he would have over powered Tito and end it within three rounds.
Jackson was much too powerful for Tito. Tito's aggressive style would have made Jackson's day.Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Tito beat better fighters at light middle so that is why I have gone for him. If Julian Jackson landed Tito would not get up that is for sure but because he fought and beat better opposition I would just bet on Tito. Terry Norris nearly beat him and McCallum certainly did.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
julian jackson by ko
at 147 & 154 there aren't many punchers I'd pick over Tito.
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks