Quote Originally Posted by Heavy D
For the record, a>b, b>c, therefore a>c doesn't really work in the MMA world. While you raise some good points, don't forget that in the Randleman and Coleman (first one) fights, Fedor was losing until he pulled the sub out of his ass. Fedor is far from invincible. He HAS been rocked, he HAS been held down, he HAS lost his back. He won't get out of it every time.

And as far as Barnett vs Randy went, Barnett is a slightly larger and ever so slightly stronger person than Fedor (note the extreme understatements there). But like I said...MMAth doesn't work....just because A did this against B, doesn't mean crap against C.
Yeah,I can see what you mean but this point stood out most from that article:

Fedor is bigger, stronger, faster, more skilled, much younger and hits harder than Randy. He also fought a fighter very similar in style to Randy four months ago. Lindland is about twenty pound lighter than Couture but Matt is also a better wrestler and more skilled at submissions. Fedor submitted him in two minutes without throwing a punch.

It's difficult to argue against that and remember,Randy has also been knocked out by Chuck. I'd think Fedor hits harder than him. I'm not saying Randy cannot win because anything can happen in MMA,I just think the odds are stacked against him(which is usually the case but this is no Sylvia etc)