I didn't like it much myself but I was not about to keep posting the same poll over and over again.Originally Posted by Jimboogie
At least I didn't sign in on a different name and start duplicating votes![]()
I didn't like it much myself but I was not about to keep posting the same poll over and over again.Originally Posted by Jimboogie
At least I didn't sign in on a different name and start duplicating votes![]()
This really is a pick em fight. At lightweight...Shane would have the slight advantage. At welterweight...Pernell would. But at either weight it would be a damn good fight. Shane's athleticism and speed would be the ultimate test for Whitaker's incredible defense...and vice versa.
8-8 even again but i do agree its too close to call.
I still don't see why Whitaker, the smaller man, gets credit as they go up in weight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks