
Originally Posted by
LEGION

Originally Posted by
Violent Demise

Originally Posted by
LEGION
Like VD said, age might very well be a factor; so no point in the fight to me. If Joe whoops him he'll get no credit from all the "experts". Makes plenty of sense for Hopkins as it just adds money to his retirement plan, and obviously Joe would make a boatload to, so maybe that's motivation enough for Joe to fight B-Hop next year, as he should be able to finish with big $ fights. I'll watch it, only to see Joe. Hopkins held so much with Wright there were times I thought he fell asleep, I know I did. Would be intriguing if only to be on this forum and listen to all the build-up. I'd say Joe wins by ud, no k..o.'s in this one.
There was no pint in Calzaghe-Manfredo. Yet it still happened
You're right, for sure. That was a stupid fight for real, the fact it was made and the fight itself. But I never gave Joe credit for beating a bum either. Would much rather see Hopkins than Manfraudo anyday. From a $$$ point of view Hopkins/Calzaghe makes perfect sense.
Does every single one of Joe's fight have to be scrutnized
Why did Mayweather fight gatti

didnt everyone know he was going to win...
I see people is already giving hopkins an out... 24 hours ago VD would have said how B-hop would whip Calzaghe A$$, but after seeing what Calzaghe did to Kessler, Hopkins seems older
hopkins is a legit top 5 P4Per anyone who can beat winky convincingly isnt to old to fight..
Calzaghe combos to hopkins face has alot more to do with calzaghe winning than hopkins age...
hopkins is the same now (or better) than ever... he has adapted his style with age and has much more energy at the end of fights than the younger fighters (Taylor and winky) he has faced... and calzaghe will be 36 when they fight....
calzaghe will beat hopkins because he is better than hopkins...
Bookmarks