Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35

Thread: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    All of this hype-man hysteria has me thinking of a clip I saw ?? be back

    And request for a poll update there Rooster ?
    Poll update: 11-7 still in favor of buying the PPV...

    BTW you can call me "FightingCock" or "GameCock" (rooster )
    Last edited by XaduBoxer; 08-13-2008 at 04:20 AM.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2169
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    I'm just getting tired of seeing all these fuking threads they keep making for a fight that isn't even made yet!!!!!!!!!

    Keep this crap in one thread, you're wasting good space, and you're not going to change anyone's mind with this crap.

    I like Manny, but you guys are making me want to seem him get pounded into oblivion.

    You're over doing it.

    I think i've seen more Cotto v Mayweather threads in the last few months, and one of those fighters is stone cold retired...

    What's good for the goose must be good for the gander..

    I'm completely against ODLH v PAC, but always when there is a shadow of superfight looming, topics get beaten to death over and over.. Hatton Mayweather I think had 12 topics on the first page alone, all basically saying the same thing...

    I find it saddening though that people actually have to be spending thread after thread DEFENDING the validity of this fight... When there are equal amount of thread actually BEGGING for other fights to happen, that probably won't because the money isn't there, and ODLH is pulling the strings....

    It's backwards I tells ya..

  3. #18
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything


  4. #19
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    I'm just getting tired of seeing all these fuking threads they keep making for a fight that isn't even made yet!!!!!!!!!

    Keep this crap in one thread, you're wasting good space, and you're not going to change anyone's mind with this crap.

    I like Manny, but you guys are making me want to seem him get pounded into oblivion.

    You're over doing it.
    Confusing as phuk if you ask me, I come in here thinking the fight is a done deal



    I don't want to see Manny get pounded into oblivion
    And if the match is made, I will rooting with all of my heart for the little guy

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Wladimir Klitschko vs Chris Byrd
    George Foreman vs Michael Moorer
    George Foreman vs Joe Frazier
    Evander Holyfield vs Mike Tyson
    Buster Douglas vs Mike Tyson
    Lennox Lewis vs Mike Tyson
    Tommy Hearns vs Roberto Duran
    Alexis Arguello vs Ray Mancini


    I could go on....I mean the only reason you remember the "David vs Goliath" fights is because they are sensational due to the size difference but big guys USUALLY beat the smaller guys which is why that is ho-hum and common place. I could list more big guys beating little guys that you would ever care to read about.


    Your thread is a SAD attempt to legitimize a fight that isn't worth watching....even if it was FREE
    Lyle who are you calling David and who are you calling Goliath in the Holyfield-Tyson matchup? Holyfield was taller but Tyson was the natural Heavyweight. Tommy Hearns was taller than Tyson but I certainly wouldn't have said he was BIGGER. I could make a list of fighters that have stepped up and beat bigger guys just like your list.

    Michael Spinks v Larry Holmes x2 (although I didn't agree)
    Roy Jones Jr v John Ruiz
    Floyd Mayweather v Oscar De La Hoya
    Michael Moorer v Evander Holyfield
    Roy Jones Jr v James Toney
    SRL v Marvin Hagler
    Roberto Duran v SRL

    This list too could go on and on.

    I would be quite interested in a ODLH-Pac fight even though I would rather see Oscar fight Marg I just can't see it happening. I'd be willing to bet that it would be on of the biggest selling fights in history anyway. Just the fact that its Oscars last fight would have even non boxing fans buying it I think.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    I'm hyped about this fight since it's a win-win situation for both boxers;

    Oscar wins - he defeated the currently recognized no. 1 P4P best boxer in the world. He gets no credit for beating up on a much smaller man, and rather gets ridiculed for refusing to fight someone like Margarito, who would mess up his Golden Boy face.

    Oscar loses - there's no shame in losing to the currently recognized no. 1 P4P best boxer in the world.
    He gets doubly ridiculed for losing to the much smaller man. Bye-bye legacy.

    Pacquiao wins - will be in excellent position to call out PBF from retirement. PBF vs. PAC will be another huge fight for boxing fans.

    Pacquiao loses - he lost to the bigger boxer...

    .



    There...... I corrected it for you.


  7. #22
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    [quote=rjj tszyu;586414]
    Lyle who are you calling David and who are you calling Goliath in the Holyfield-Tyson matchup? Holyfield was taller but Tyson was the natural Heavyweight. Tommy Hearns was taller than Tyson but I certainly wouldn't have said he was BIGGER. I could make a list of fighters that have stepped up and beat bigger guys just like your list.
    [quote]
    Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield may have started out in different weight classes BUT Holyfield was the bigger guy he was not only taller but he was in better shape than Tyson, he was stronger and had more stamina and in the rematch they both weighed in at 218.

    And if you don't like that then how about Bowe-Holyfield or Lewis-Holyfield?

  8. #23
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    I'm hyped about this fight since it's a win-win situation for both boxers;

    Oscar wins - he defeated the currently recognized no. 1 P4P best boxer in the world. He gets no credit for beating up on a much smaller man, and rather gets ridiculed for refusing to fight someone like Margarito, who would mess up his Golden Boy face.

    Oscar loses - there's no shame in losing to the currently recognized no. 1 P4P best boxer in the world.
    He gets doubly ridiculed for losing to the much smaller man. Bye-bye legacy.

    Pacquiao wins - will be in excellent position to call out PBF from retirement. PBF vs. PAC will be another huge fight for boxing fans.

    Pacquiao loses - he lost to the bigger boxer...

    .

    There...... I corrected it for you.

    Your corrections is the general sentiments... I rather wait 'til the fight is over before giving my final assessment... that's IF the fight will be made...

    .

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    [QUOTE=Lyle;586634][quote=rjj tszyu;586414]
    Lyle who are you calling David and who are you calling Goliath in the Holyfield-Tyson matchup? Holyfield was taller but Tyson was the natural Heavyweight. Tommy Hearns was taller than Tyson but I certainly wouldn't have said he was BIGGER. I could make a list of fighters that have stepped up and beat bigger guys just like your list.
    Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield may have started out in different weight classes BUT Holyfield was the bigger guy he was not only taller but he was in better shape than Tyson, he was stronger and had more stamina and in the rematch they both weighed in at 218.

    And if you don't like that then how about Bowe-Holyfield or Lewis-Holyfield?
    Yep being a huge Evander fan I loved Bowe-Holyfield II and I actually scored the Lewis-Holyfield II fight a draw so in my eyes the right results came out of them 2 fights just in the wrong order

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Does anybody remember the last time somebody went up a total of 7 weight classess to fight? Help me cause I don't.

  11. #26
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Wladimir Klitschko vs Chris Byrd
    George Foreman vs Michael Moorer
    George Foreman vs Joe Frazier
    Evander Holyfield vs Mike Tyson
    Buster Douglas vs Mike Tyson
    Lennox Lewis vs Mike Tyson
    Tommy Hearns vs Roberto Duran
    Alexis Arguello vs Ray Mancini


    I could go on....I mean the only reason you remember the "David vs Goliath" fights is because they are sensational due to the size difference but big guys USUALLY beat the smaller guys which is why that is ho-hum and common place. I could list more big guys beating little guys that you would ever care to read about.


    Your thread is a SAD attempt to legitimize a fight that isn't worth watching....even if it was FREE

    Yeah it's SAD... very SAD... for DelaHoya...
    .

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    so when the Pacquiao news is a little slow, Saddoboxer bumps threads from a year ago.

    Also, while you were pointing out that Lyle was wrong, you were wrong yourself in saying this was a no lose situation for De La Hoya. sooo....

    Basically I wanted to neg rep you but I couldn't.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2811
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    of course you realize that in PAC - DLH size turned out to be irrelevant. It was all about fitness and conditioning, age, whatever. DLH just wasn't there. There was no glory in beating that version of DLH, that's for sure.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,047
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Wladimir Klitschko vs Chris Byrd
    George Foreman vs Michael Moorer
    George Foreman vs Joe Frazier
    Evander Holyfield vs Mike Tyson
    Buster Douglas vs Mike Tyson
    Lennox Lewis vs Mike Tyson
    Tommy Hearns vs Roberto Duran
    Alexis Arguello vs Ray Mancini


    I could go on....I mean the only reason you remember the "David vs Goliath" fights is because they are sensational due to the size difference but big guys USUALLY beat the smaller guys which is why that is ho-hum and common place. I could list more big guys beating little guys that you would ever care to read about.


    Your thread is a SAD attempt to legitimize a fight that isn't worth watching....even if it was FREE

    Yeah it's SAD... very SAD... for DelaHoya...
    .
    Little desperate eh ?

  15. #30
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: DelaHoya vs. Pacquiao - SIZE is not everything

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    so when the Pacquiao news is a little slow, Saddoboxer bumps threads from a year ago.

    Also, while you were pointing out that Lyle was wrong, you were wrong yourself in saying this was a no lose situation for De La Hoya. sooo....

    Basically I wanted to neg rep you but I couldn't.

    I was looking for some Chagaev-Valuev info and I dig up this thread...

    You know it's lots of fun reading some old postings... Some fun at the expense of others...

    That explained the bump... Have some fun...
    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What size sparring gloves do you use?
    By RozzySean in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-05-2008, 10:16 AM
  2. Ideal size for a lightweight?
    By Flip Skinny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 07:11 PM
  3. Glove size
    By Bomp in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-17-2006, 01:43 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing