Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Ordinary World Titles??

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ordinary World Titles??

    Mean Ali only became a champion that many times because he lost to a guy named Spinks who he never should of lost to but eh. I think Holyfeild titles hold just as much weight as Ali's did but its all on how you look at it back in Ali's day they never had to deal with all the different belts. Even if you look at the ring it has flaws i dont care for either it is the fighter that makes the belt what it is not the wba, wbc, wbo, ibf and yea not even the ring mag it self.
    Last edited by Mr140; 04-15-2009 at 06:39 PM.

  2. #17
    jon09 Guest

    Smile Re: Ordinary World Titles??

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drago View Post
    is there anything as fans we can do to detroy these belts? any suggestions!
    Quit paying attention to them. We know who the lineal champs are, just follow the Ring Magazine's ratings.

    Although, it would really help if HBO, Showtime, and ESPN all agreed to stop showing the belts or making reference to them on the air. HBO used to do this to the WBO back in the 1990's. They intentionally ignored it.
    Yeah but its funny how the Ring mentions them in their magazine and almanac. The bible of boxing wants to be recognized as the lone belt but still gives them publicity. I don't get that 1.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ordinary World Titles??

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Mean Ali only became a champion that many times because he lost to a guy named Spinks who he never should of lost to but eh. I think Holyfeild titles hold just as much weight as Ali's did but its all on how you look at it back in Ali's day they never had to deal with all the different belts. Even if you look at the ring it has flaws i dont care for either it is the fighter that makes the belt what it is not the wba, wbc, wbo, ibf and yea not even the ring mag it self.
    Holyfield is a legitimate 2x heavyweight champion. He won his 3rd title when George Forman was THE Champ, and he won his 4th title when Lennox Lewis was THE champ.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ordinary World Titles??

    Quote Originally Posted by jon09 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Drago View Post
    is there anything as fans we can do to detroy these belts? any suggestions!
    Quit paying attention to them. We know who the lineal champs are, just follow the Ring Magazine's ratings.

    Although, it would really help if HBO, Showtime, and ESPN all agreed to stop showing the belts or making reference to them on the air. HBO used to do this to the WBO back in the 1990's. They intentionally ignored it.
    Yeah but its funny how the Ring mentions them in their magazine and almanac. The bible of boxing wants to be recognized as the lone belt but still gives them publicity. I don't get that 1.
    The Ring Magazine first and foremost reports the news, and like it or not, the alphabet titles are still a part of the story in boxing.

  5. #20
    jon09 Guest

    Smile Re: Ordinary World Titles??

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jon09 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post

    Quit paying attention to them. We know who the lineal champs are, just follow the Ring Magazine's ratings.

    Although, it would really help if HBO, Showtime, and ESPN all agreed to stop showing the belts or making reference to them on the air. HBO used to do this to the WBO back in the 1990's. They intentionally ignored it.
    Yeah but its funny how the Ring mentions them in their magazine and almanac. The bible of boxing wants to be recognized as the lone belt but still gives them publicity. I don't get that 1.
    The Ring Magazine first and foremost reports the news, and like it or not, the alphabet titles are still a part of the story in boxing.
    The fighters should be the news not those damn belts. I'm going to order 1 online and call myself a champion. Thats the problem! These gangs of boxing have taken over and are destroying our sport.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 05:31 PM
  2. Khan targets three world titles
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-27-2007, 06:54 PM
  3. Khan targets three world titles
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-26-2007, 02:03 PM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-10-2006, 12:23 AM
  5. Has David Tua won any major world titles?
    By Mintymen in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-25-2006, 01:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing