Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,786
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3627
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

    Bilbo's Mom
    Banned


    a haha. Bilbo cracks me up so much. Bet will still be reading this thread as a visitor...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    It is illogical captian.


    Hahaha

    Bravo sir.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

    What about this logic. If Roach and Pac thought they could beat Cotto at 147 then the fight would be at 147. Seems like the fans, who cut nary a pound, are more confident that the catchweight has no bearings. But the real trainers and fighters know differently.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

    Logical Position 8 If Manny is to fight the guys at 147 lbs he will have moved up as many divisions as Roy Jones did, from flyweight to welter is equal to middleweight to heavyweight in terms of number of weight classes.

    Logical Position 9 Unlike Roy Jones, Manny is intending to fight the BEST in those weight classes. He is not fighting guys who are inferior to him in everything apart from size, he is wanting to fight guys of equal talent to himself, other elite fighters

    Many things wrong with this comparitive reach. Pac has not fought a welterweight as of yet let alone intending to fight the best at 'those weight classes.' He fought DLH, who is a junior middle not a welterweight, at 147 and he intends to fight Cotto at 145, that is a catchweight. RJJ never fought Ruiz at a catchweight. And just counting weight classes doesn't tell the whole story. Not to mention that you got it wrong, flyweight to welterweight is actually more weight classes than middleweight to heavyweight. It is almost twice the number of weight classess but it is about half the poundage. Ruiz is not near the level Cotto is but the size difference between Pac and Cotto is not near the size difference between Jones and Ruiz, especially considering the catchweight. At some point Pac and Cotto will weigh about the same. At no point did Ruiz and Jones even come close to being even in the same ballpark of weight. Roy fighting the best at heavyweight isn't the same as asking Pac to fight the same at welterweight. Heavyweight has no limit in size as welterweight does. If Roy and Pac were to equal feats in moving up and Roy would've been asked to have fought the very best at heavyweight, who would've been Lewis, then to equal size difference Pac would've been asked to have fought Bernard Hopkins at middleweight. In both cases the size differences are inhumane to sanction. A closer comparison for Jones and Pac to come close to equal feats Jones would have fought a guy like Holyfield at heavyweight and Pac a guy like Mosley at junior middleweight.
    Last edited by blegit; 07-06-2009 at 05:28 PM.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    572
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1010
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can anyone argue with my logic here?

    I stopped reading after #4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Just Reviewing The Logic
    By amat in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-30-2008, 04:34 AM
  2. The logic behind the Taylor/Pavlik clause?
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-12-2008, 03:03 AM
  3. Most want to see it, who am I to argue.
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-03-2007, 12:38 AM
  4. Honestly, do all of you really discredit "beat the man" logic
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 09:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing