Exactly Jaz, people I think have taken the attitude of not getting outraged about this cause Dirrell was so negative, fair enough, but its the worst decision in a while, far more controversial than Cotto-Clottey or Diaz-Malignaggi. There is no good argument for Froch winning rounds, all you hear from people is that they didn't like how Dirrell was winning rounds so lets give them to Froch.
Seriously has anybody made a case for Froch winning because of what he did? I haven't seen it. I'm bitter I admit it. I sound like Majesty.

But the whole thing was a joke.
Bookmarks