
Originally Posted by
hakkai619
Hmm... You dont get it too. I gotta ask you. When was the FIRST time manny has been suspected of PEDS and WHO was the one who first clammored about it? It was after the HATTON fight. Who was the first one bitchin? It was FLOYD MAYWEATHER SR. Now him accusing pac about steroids on that point dont you think is alot more related to being he was Hatton's trainer and his fighter lost so horribly? Maybe a little more miffed? Whats in your mind see is the very natural and human skill of finding patterns. These patterns you see might either be true or just in your mind. Its as what atheists base their disbelief in god lies. Since there are no scientific proofs that god exists hence no god. True but doesnt change the fact that people still believe in him. This also applies to peoples belief in aliens, crop circles, ghosts and so on. The pattern you talk about is this:
In your mind you believe that Pac is powerful and fast but in small weights = he goes up in weight hence he loses power and speed = your belief is shattered when the fact that pac has beat up larger men (sometimes more so when its your favorite fighter) = then you hypothesize that this is illogical and something must be wrong = your assumption is further strengthened by others belief that something IS wrong (From the statements of figures like Floyd mayweather snr and paulie malignaggi) = Pac denies RANDOM CLOSE TO THE FIGHT testing due to a number of personal reasons = Something must be wrong since he doesnt wanna take MAYWEATHERS test.
True the world is judged according to patterns and the "norm", but when something seems to go against the norm then it should be investigated. Manny is producing results against what is the norm and what has been seen in other fighters. It could of course just be his god-given gift/talent/he's a freek, but the other explanation is that he could be on PEDs.
I follow the belief that "common things are common". First you must rule out the obvious explanations then move onto the less obvious ones.
Manny has bucked the trend so closer attention must be paid to him (you don't pay closer attention to an individual who is not performing amazingly i.e. Clements, Marion Jones, Bonds, Ben Johnson etc)
Then when the individual refuses to comply with a simple test that clearly exclude the obvious causes of his performances then obviously any unbiased person would have to ask why? Then even more attention will be focused on this individual. Then when the asked about their refusal to take the tests, said individual presents various reason from various people around them each of which has been contradicted.
Ultimately the individual settles on "a number of personal reasons" and both they and their fans should just believe them because they say so and are likable.
Its all very well being innocent until being proven guilty, but when you refuse
to take a simple test that would prove that your clean, then do not complain when people start questioning it.
Ultimately following all his amazing achievements, if Usain Bolt refused to comply with a new blood test or testing system that was thought to be more sensitive/accurate with the defense that he had "a number of personal reasons", a lot of questions would be asked, with or without Mayweather Sr's opinion.
To use your analogy, if believer claims a miracle had occurred. But a non-believer says that there is an explainable cause of said miracle and that a simple test could prove it. The believer refuses to allow the test to be done and wants to know why this is not a miracle i.e. it is a miracle until proven otherwise. If it truly is a miracle then the test would add strength to their argument
Bookmarks