Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Fight officially announced , M.E.N arena Manchester 16/04/2011

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Ketchup.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.

    Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.

    Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
    #1 Why would Warren pay Sky when Khan left him for Golden Boy?
    #2 Not well ranked? McCloskey has a high WBC ranking and is the European Champion.
    #3 Why would a "World title" be less than the IBO or European title, and if this is the case, then why is the European Champion risking vacating his belt for a shot at the WBA Champion.
    #4 Froch does fight the best, but Khan just beat one of the division's best in Maidana and has a pretty decent record at 140lbs. His next fight after this will almost certainly against the divisions #1 so this will just be a tune up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Nice, I bet this fight turns out being better than alot of you(who just watch big fights and dont know shit about up and commers) think.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    Last edited by boxingbantz; 02-06-2011 at 03:29 AM.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....

    Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.

    Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
    #1 Why would Warren pay Sky when Khan left him for Golden Boy?
    #2 Not well ranked? McCloskey has a high WBC ranking and is the European Champion.
    #3 Why would a "World title" be less than the IBO or European title, and if this is the case, then why is the European Champion risking vacating his belt for a shot at the WBA Champion.
    #4 Froch does fight the best, but Khan just beat one of the division's best in Maidana and has a pretty decent record at 140lbs. His next fight after this will almost certainly against the divisions #1 so this will just be a tune up.
    Great post mate!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 06:02 PM
  2. Khan v McCloskey
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 03:57 PM
  3. Anyone Heard Of Paul McCloskey
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 02:02 PM
  4. Colin Lynes - Paul McCloskey
    By Phil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 11:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing