Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 42

Thread: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,219
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1898
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    sure they would if they connected right with him

    They would smoke Wlad too
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Phil Mitchell. (Nap)
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5049
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Think u guys r selling Haye short
    ...
    The guy has proven he can bang n hes willing to fight anyone.
    I happn to like both Klits n Haye howvr I think Vitali owns him n hes got a shot at beating Wlad.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Think u guys r selling Haye short
    ...
    The guy has proven he can bang n hes willing to fight anyone.
    I happn to like both Klits n Haye howvr I think Vitali owns him n hes got a shot at beating Wlad.
    that mirrors my views , Haye could KO Wlad early , however Vitali takes Hayes power and stops him inside 3

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1086
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    In any other era both Wlad and Haye are mediocre heavies. Actually you can add Vitali to that list but i think it's laughable to create a thread like this hating on the current fighters as they are just doing what they can with what they have in front of them. Haye unified Cruiser and won a belt at heavy, Wlad near unified heavy and Vit has a long reign and is dominant at forty these three are the elite heavy fighters of our ERA.

    But let's not fool ourselves, I'm a Haye fan, your a Klit fan so rabid that you refuse to refer to David Haye using his name but the reality is a win over Haye is the crowning moment in either brothers career because despite having 25 fights is it? he is the biggest and most accomplished fighter they have fought bar Lewis. And Vit lost the Lewis fight by TKO.

    We have three mediocre heavyweight champions in fact I'd pick a prime Frank Bruno or Oliver Mcall to be the dominant champion if they were active fighters today.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,290
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5151
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Bruce Seldon......wait Stamina problems, fast hands, shakey chin, lack of top tier hvy competition...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1532
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by piye View Post
    In any other era both Wlad and Haye are mediocre heavies. Actually you can add Vitali to that list but i think it's laughable to create a thread like this hating on the current fighters as they are just doing what they can with what they have in front of them. Haye unified Cruiser and won a belt at heavy, Wlad near unified heavy and Vit has a long reign and is dominant at forty these three are the elite heavy fighters of our ERA.

    But let's not fool ourselves, I'm a Haye fan, your a Klit fan so rabid that you refuse to refer to David Haye using his name but the reality is a win over Haye is the crowning moment in either brothers career because despite having 25 fights is it? he is the biggest and most accomplished fighter they have fought bar Lewis. And Vit lost the Lewis fight by TKO.

    We have three mediocre heavyweight champions in fact I'd pick a prime Frank Bruno or Oliver Mcall to be the dominant champion if they were active fighters today.
    Wlad is a mediocre heavyweight? Besides Lennox and his brother who would beat him more often than not?

    I would love to see Foreman get past that jab, or Frazier trying to figure out how to get on the inside. Tyson would be able to knock Wlad out a few of the times, but more often than not he would be contained and eventually ko'ed.

    Wlad has really good speed for his size, strength that only handful of heavyweights ever possessed, and the most dominant jab maybe the sport has ever seen. Larry Holmes had an amazing jab, but it didn't make opponents completely gun shy. THe difference is that Holmes has a snake like snappy jab that stunned opponents, and Wlad has a ramming jab that pummels opponents. HIs is like a right hand, and his makes 240 pound guys quit trying.


    Any of the top guys would have had a one punch type chance against Wlad, but he has made it so hard to hit him cleanly. He uses that jab, and he uses a decent cross on the outside then he falls on you when you get inside on him. You can't just counter over the jab because Wlad is quick and he comes forward behind it seamlessly with the punch, and he has a great feeling for range to go along with his height, so he doesn't throw the jab short, and if you are fast then he just waits a bit until you set your feet before he throws it. As he has gotten more confident it's become harder and harder for opponents to do anything against him.

    You can complain about the modern heavyweight division all you want, but it's really not that bad, and actually is far better than the one in the 80's. Where Larry Holmes and Tyson faced the same thing that they were vastly superior to the field around them.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 127
    Last Post: 04-24-2010, 09:20 AM
  2. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 02:34 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 11:33 PM
  4. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-01-2009, 11:10 AM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 08:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing