For us Pactards

**chris6878** · 05-08-2012 06:51 PM

Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.

**Master** · 05-08-2012 07:01 PM

The whole thread comparing how they have fought fighters they have in common can be abused to suit either Pac Man or Floyd. I believe Floyd is firm favourite to win the fight at welterweight and as such Bob Arum will not allow the fight to happen in the near future.

**ElTerribleMorales** · 05-09-2012 01:59 AM

Originally Posted by chris6878

Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.

since when is Bradley a slick boxer? the guy is like a tiny Hopkins, only he overwhelms his opponents with volume of punches, he just doesn't have pop, Bradley is the opposite of slick and sorry IMO tailor made for Pacquiao, Floyd will dominate and counter Manny IMO quite effortlessly, and honestly IMO Cotto would have troubled Pacquiao even more than he did Floyd at 154

**chris6878** · 05-09-2012 03:06 AM

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Originally Posted by chris6878

Floyd lays on the ropes on purpose? So did Roy when he began his slide. Now we see what has happened to superman. Why didn't Floyd stay in the middle and dominate cotto. I said the same thing about Roy vs tarver. Was Floyd trying to prove he was Ali by doing his version of rope a dope and getting a bloody nose?

I said it before that I think Floyd is on the slide. Will he lay on the ropes and let a very fast and powerful paq throw bombs? Does Floyd still have the same amount of stamina?

I know one thing, we will see how good paq is when he faces his first slick boxer June 9th. If he hurts or koes Bradley then I guarantee we will never see him fight Floyd.

since when is Bradley a slick boxer? the guy is like a tiny Hopkins, only he overwhelms his opponents with volume of punches, he just doesn't have pop, Bradley is the opposite of slick and sorry IMO tailor made for Pacquiao, Floyd will dominate and counter Manny IMO quite effortlessly, and honestly IMO Cotto would have troubled Pacquiao even more than he did Floyd at 154

PAC at 154 is like Floyd at light heavy. Of course cotto would trouble PAC at that weight. I agree Bradley ain't the slickest but he is probably the first boxer with some decent movement that he has faced. I think PAC will win and it will be very exciting to watch.