why are there bad decisions?

[bzkfn]

There should NEVER be home advantage.
There should NEVER be judges from any of the fighters hometowns

Fighters risk there life, it should be set with these rules so they don't risk it for nothing.

There has to be home advantage. Fights in neutral venues will not make a fighter anywhere near the kind of money they could otherwise. Think about it, you're Scottish (I'm assuming). If you support either Celtic or Rnagers, would you go and watch them play St. Johnstone in Dublin? Hometown fighting helps generate a fanbase, and thus helps a fighter gain more money per fight. To combat this, I would allow the away fighter some adantages, like a couple of judges from his town or a referee more favourable to his type of fighting.

[Vendettos]

There should NEVER be home advantage.
There should NEVER be judges from any of the fighters hometowns

Fighters risk there life, it should be set with these rules so they don't risk it for nothing.

There has to be home advantage. Fights in neutral venues will not make a fighter anywhere near the kind of money they could otherwise. Think about it, you're Scottish (I'm assuming). If you support either Celtic or Rnagers, would you go and watch them play St. Johnstone in Dublin? Hometown fighting helps generate a fanbase, and thus helps a fighter gain more money per fight. To combat this, I would allow the away fighter some adantages, like a couple of judges from his town or a referee more favourable to his type of fighting.

Scottish yes, and Rangers

Dook Koo Kim to name a few, travelling across the world and risking life. You think if that fight lasted to the end of the 15 he'd have gotten the decision if it was even slightly close? Every judge was 4 or plus points in favor of Mancini. In a fight that I've seen and struggle to score.

Watch and score this fight 10 time and you'll have 10 different scores at the end. Mancini was winning that fight regardless.

Things need to be fair!