Fantasy football is the most frustrating game in the world

[TitoFan]

I think the problem is you just suck at it. It was only a couple of weeks ago you were calling the Seattle defense unstoppable. That it was damn near impossible to score of them. And some other nonsense. Than a young Colt team puts up 34 on them. Unstoppable, huh?

Well... I'm not a fantasy guru, if that's what you mean. But I can't help notice you write this after the Seahawks' downer of a game against the Colts, while making no mention of limiting the 49ers to 3 points a few weeks ago.

Besides, in fantasy defense, where turnovers count for points.... Seattle isn't doing too badly.
Furthermore, they're 4-1 right now.
Surely you probably expected a 2-3 or something of that nature.

I expect 3-2. I never once said Seattle defense was terrible. They have a good defense. You for whatever reason decided to pump it up as some unstoppable force that couldn't be scored on. When it obviously can be scored on

nfl football - Defensive Rankings & Statistics - November, 2013 | Odds Shark

2013 NFL Regular Season Divisional Standings - National Football League - ESPN


I'm not even gonna gloat.
I'm just gonna post these links here and bask in the glory of proving you wrong YET AGAIN.

3rd in the league in scoring defense....... 10-1 record.

You saw the Colts hang 34 on them, and immediately came to a conclusion.
Tsk, tsk, tsk....... when will you ever learn?

Is this what you been reduced too? Seriously? That's just sad. It's nice Seattle has won all there games since the Colts loss. I see you're easily impressed by wins over the 4-6 Titans, 6-4 Cardinals, 4-6 Rams, 2-8 Bucs, 2-8 Falcons and 2-8 Vikings. And they barely beat the Rams and Bucs. Like I said before there a good team. But there not a Super Bowl team.

Try harder.

Not a Super Bowl team, huh?
Ahhh..... I just love it when you're wrong and I'm right.
Which happens regularly, I know..... but even in football?

[Violent Demise]

I think the problem is you just suck at it. It was only a couple of weeks ago you were calling the Seattle defense unstoppable. That it was damn near impossible to score of them. And some other nonsense. Than a young Colt team puts up 34 on them. Unstoppable, huh?

Well... I'm not a fantasy guru, if that's what you mean. But I can't help notice you write this after the Seahawks' downer of a game against the Colts, while making no mention of limiting the 49ers to 3 points a few weeks ago.

Besides, in fantasy defense, where turnovers count for points.... Seattle isn't doing too badly.
Furthermore, they're 4-1 right now.
Surely you probably expected a 2-3 or something of that nature.

I expect 3-2. I never once said Seattle defense was terrible. They have a good defense. You for whatever reason decided to pump it up as some unstoppable force that couldn't be scored on. When it obviously can be scored on

nfl football - Defensive Rankings & Statistics - November, 2013 | Odds Shark

2013 NFL Regular Season Divisional Standings - National Football League - ESPN


I'm not even gonna gloat.
I'm just gonna post these links here and bask in the glory of proving you wrong YET AGAIN.

3rd in the league in scoring defense....... 10-1 record.

You saw the Colts hang 34 on them, and immediately came to a conclusion.
Tsk, tsk, tsk....... when will you ever learn?

Is this what you been reduced too? Seriously? That's just sad. It's nice Seattle has won all there games since the Colts loss. I see you're easily impressed by wins over the 4-6 Titans, 6-4 Cardinals, 4-6 Rams, 2-8 Bucs, 2-8 Falcons and 2-8 Vikings. And they barely beat the Rams and Bucs. Like I said before there a good team. But there not a Super Bowl team.

Try harder.

Not a Super Bowl team, huh?
Ahhh..... I just love it when you're wrong and I'm right.
Which happens regularly, I know..... but even in football?

You still think it's an unstoppable, monster of a defense that can't be scored on?

[TitoFan]

I think the problem is you just suck at it. It was only a couple of weeks ago you were calling the Seattle defense unstoppable. That it was damn near impossible to score of them. And some other nonsense. Than a young Colt team puts up 34 on them. Unstoppable, huh?

Well... I'm not a fantasy guru, if that's what you mean. But I can't help notice you write this after the Seahawks' downer of a game against the Colts, while making no mention of limiting the 49ers to 3 points a few weeks ago.

Besides, in fantasy defense, where turnovers count for points.... Seattle isn't doing too badly.
Furthermore, they're 4-1 right now.
Surely you probably expected a 2-3 or something of that nature.

I expect 3-2. I never once said Seattle defense was terrible. They have a good defense. You for whatever reason decided to pump it up as some unstoppable force that couldn't be scored on. When it obviously can be scored on

nfl football - Defensive Rankings & Statistics - November, 2013 | Odds Shark

2013 NFL Regular Season Divisional Standings - National Football League - ESPN


I'm not even gonna gloat.
I'm just gonna post these links here and bask in the glory of proving you wrong YET AGAIN.

3rd in the league in scoring defense....... 10-1 record.

You saw the Colts hang 34 on them, and immediately came to a conclusion.
Tsk, tsk, tsk....... when will you ever learn?

Is this what you been reduced too? Seriously? That's just sad. It's nice Seattle has won all there games since the Colts loss. I see you're easily impressed by wins over the 4-6 Titans, 6-4 Cardinals, 4-6 Rams, 2-8 Bucs, 2-8 Falcons and 2-8 Vikings. And they barely beat the Rams and Bucs. Like I said before there a good team. But there not a Super Bowl team.

Try harder.

Not a Super Bowl team, huh?
Ahhh..... I just love it when you're wrong and I'm right.
Which happens regularly, I know..... but even in football?

You still think it's an unstoppable, monster of a defense that can't be scored on?

Well, they made the Super Bowl. But I gotta admit........

Peyton + Demaryius + Welker + Decker + Julius = One of the most unstoppable offenses I've ever seen on a football field.

I've always admired Peyton, so I won't be too sad if he wins. Besides, he needs to catch his lucky, inconsistent, lousy little brother in Super Bowl titles. But I like the Seahawks, too, 'cause they've never won.

I just hope it's a good game.

[TitoFan]

I think the problem is you just suck at it. It was only a couple of weeks ago you were calling the Seattle defense unstoppable. That it was damn near impossible to score of them. And some other nonsense. Than a young Colt team puts up 34 on them. Unstoppable, huh?

Well... I'm not a fantasy guru, if that's what you mean. But I can't help notice you write this after the Seahawks' downer of a game against the Colts, while making no mention of limiting the 49ers to 3 points a few weeks ago.

Besides, in fantasy defense, where turnovers count for points.... Seattle isn't doing too badly.
Furthermore, they're 4-1 right now.
Surely you probably expected a 2-3 or something of that nature.

I expect 3-2. I never once said Seattle defense was terrible. They have a good defense. You for whatever reason decided to pump it up as some unstoppable force that couldn't be scored on. When it obviously can be scored on

nfl football - Defensive Rankings & Statistics - November, 2013 | Odds Shark

2013 NFL Regular Season Divisional Standings - National Football League - ESPN


I'm not even gonna gloat.
I'm just gonna post these links here and bask in the glory of proving you wrong YET AGAIN.

3rd in the league in scoring defense....... 10-1 record.

You saw the Colts hang 34 on them, and immediately came to a conclusion.
Tsk, tsk, tsk....... when will you ever learn?

Is this what you been reduced too? Seriously? That's just sad. It's nice Seattle has won all there games since the Colts loss. I see you're easily impressed by wins over the 4-6 Titans, 6-4 Cardinals, 4-6 Rams, 2-8 Bucs, 2-8 Falcons and 2-8 Vikings. And they barely beat the Rams and Bucs. Like I said before there a good team. But there not a Super Bowl team.

Try harder.

Hey VD!!! Come in here and get some!!

How do you like your crow? Broiled? Baked? Or fried?