A few young limp-d!<ks say Heavyweights today are far superior to anyone from the 1990s and earlier, but those contenders back then didn't have t!t$ !!!
A few young limp-d!<ks say Heavyweights today are far superior to anyone from the 1990s and earlier, but those contenders back then didn't have t!t$ !!!
I think you over extended my analysis just a little bit there..
And just what is the issue with the fat levels of either fighter here? Besides aesthetic?
They are "Heavyweight boxers" not models! A lot of those cut guys you are talking about got completely smashed by chubby boxers didn't they!
All thats important is that they have performance and durability which they do!
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Bigger man George, bigger punch!
Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
Hidden Content
It's like this.
You can only be as lean in HW boxing as you have the luxury of being tall.
And at HW you can compensate for your lack of height by being chubby!
Chubby boxers are often the more dangerous opponents because they still have the weight for power but have better stamina because less muscles burning oxygen which are really only useful for grappling in the clinch and bullying. Plus they can most times take a harder punch because of well oiled tissues and padding.
Obviousy this only applies to a HW boxer who is also an elite trained athlete. He has the conditioning and the neuromuscular adaptions. Not to a fighter who is fat because he is untrained, only too one that is trained very hard but eats his way chubby. There's a BIG difference.
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
finished badly Arreola
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks