Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    726
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.
    Yea cant see Jennings lasting with Wilder. Looked very average last night to me against a good fighter but a lazy fighter who looked very tired in the 2nd half of the fight. Id say Wilder would get Jennings out of there in the 1st half of the fight. Stiverne would be a more interesting fight but I think Stiverne would stop him late.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,038
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.
    Who said he'd box? Wilder hasn't shown at all he can maintain reach off the jab he has shown, nor the balance and has yet to be significantly countered with even a so so punch We're talking about a guy who has. not. gone. beyond 4 rounds..ever! Wilder is banking everything he has on bombing guys out in first couple rounds and I think he has cocooned himself into a false confidence that is going to blow up in his face. Jennings has shown more and faced better in his last 3 fights than Wilder has in his entire career and its boggling to see him so easily dismissed.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.
    Who said he'd box? Wilder hasn't shown at all he can maintain reach off the jab he has shown, nor the balance and has yet to be significantly countered with even a so so punch We're talking about a guy who has. not. gone. beyond 4 rounds..ever! Wilder is banking everything he has on bombing guys out in first couple rounds and I think he has cocooned himself into a false confidence that is going to blow up in his face. Jennings has shown more and faced better in his last 3 fights than Wilder has in his entire career and its boggling to see him so easily dismissed.
    One punch KO power trumps all when your opponent is hittable.

    Jennings is and lacks major firepower of his own.

    He may be a better overall fighter than Wilder.

    Randall Bailey and Julian Jackson knocked out plenty of guys who were better overall boxers than they were.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,038
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.
    Who said he'd box? Wilder hasn't shown at all he can maintain reach off the jab he has shown, nor the balance and has yet to be significantly countered with even a so so punch We're talking about a guy who has. not. gone. beyond 4 rounds..ever! Wilder is banking everything he has on bombing guys out in first couple rounds and I think he has cocooned himself into a false confidence that is going to blow up in his face. Jennings has shown more and faced better in his last 3 fights than Wilder has in his entire career and its boggling to see him so easily dismissed.
    One punch KO power trumps all when your opponent is hittable.

    Jennings is and lacks major firepower of his own.

    He may be a better overall fighter than Wilder.

    Randall Bailey and Julian Jackson knocked out plenty of guys who were better overall boxers than they were.
    Well Jackson was Jackson, a cut above all mentioned. I rank his one & done power as some of the best the sport has seen and Wilders by almost design and fully expected.

    I can't see Jennings taking a few shots and proving he can come back to win on a higher level as a negative while also giving a pass to Wilder who has not proven anything of the sort, not faced counters and only blitzed those he was fully expected to. Jennings can put his shots together and power can be overstated and intoxicating. You and I can list phone books on previous undefeated who came in on hyped power #'s and crumbled when guys boxed better and punched back. Morrison, Briggs, Stewart, Tshabalalawhatever his name was. Some power is really only as proven and as good as those you ko with it. I think anyway.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It was a close fight and the score cards should have reflected it. Perez looked better than Jennings in spots, and I agreed with the announcers, he looked like a different fighter in the second half of the fight than he was in the first half of the fight. Jennings also looked good in spots last night too. How about Povetkin - Jennings?


    Rat, IMO Povetkin would rip Jennings a new a-hole. Jennings is a gangly, spidery type of guy with not much power. He was not exactly breathing easy at the end last night. He has great reach and knows how to use it close in and that's unusual, but aside from The Rebel, I don't think he has ever been tested. Not impressed at all. Stiverne would KO him. Not as convinced about Wilder because he never has been tested and if Jennings takes him into the late rounds, I think its bye bye for Wilder. IF.
    I just don't know how the smaller Jennings with the shorter reach would box the 6'7 Wilder from the outside without eating that huge right hand early.
    Who said he'd box? Wilder hasn't shown at all he can maintain reach off the jab he has shown, nor the balance and has yet to be significantly countered with even a so so punch We're talking about a guy who has. not. gone. beyond 4 rounds..ever! Wilder is banking everything he has on bombing guys out in first couple rounds and I think he has cocooned himself into a false confidence that is going to blow up in his face. Jennings has shown more and faced better in his last 3 fights than Wilder has in his entire career and its boggling to see him so easily dismissed.
    One punch KO power trumps all when your opponent is hittable.

    Jennings is and lacks major firepower of his own.

    He may be a better overall fighter than Wilder.

    Randall Bailey and Julian Jackson knocked out plenty of guys who were better overall boxers than they were.
    Well Jackson was Jackson, a cut above all mentioned. I rank his one & done power as some of the best the sport has seen and Wilders by almost design and fully expected.

    I can't see Jennings taking a few shots and proving he can come back to win on a higher level as a negative while also giving a pass to Wilder who has not proven anything of the sort, not faced counters and only blitzed those he was fully expected to. Jennings can put his shots together and power can be overstated and intoxicating. You and I can list phone books on previous undefeated who came in on hyped power #'s and crumbled when guys boxed better and punched back. Morrison, Briggs, Stewart, Tshabalalawhatever his name was. Some power is really only as proven and as good as those you ko with it. I think anyway.
    You could be right. I hope not though. I see excitement and promise in Wilder.

    Jennings is good and a contender, but I don't ever see him being the champ.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Jennings confirmed himself a solid lower half contender in this fight and the best thing is he will improve and learn from this outing

    I had Jennings ahead by 2 at the end so the point deduction didn't affect my card, but it was close. Perez has no one to blame but himself, he intentionally headbutted and threw a punch on the break dude is a lazy fighter
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    I think it was a cheap shot and questionable given the timing and circumstances. Kind of greasy imo.

    Having said that Perez is lucky on the one hand that he never lost a point for all of those Hockey shoulders/door openers he threw and was warned about.

    Its the timing of the call that does not sit well with me.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    630
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    I think it was a cheap shot and questionable given the timing and circumstances. Kind of greasy imo.

    Having said that Perez is lucky on the one hand that he never lost a point for all of those Hockey shoulders/door openers he threw and was warned about.

    Its the timing of the call that does not sit well with me.
    It looked to me that the ref was breaking them because of the use of the head, then when the punch followed I think the ref had had enough of the rough housing
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    780
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    I think it was a cheap shot and questionable given the timing and circumstances. Kind of greasy imo.

    Having said that Perez is lucky on the one hand that he never lost a point for all of those Hockey shoulders/door openers he threw and was warned about.

    Its the timing of the call that does not sit well with me.
    I think the ref finally said that's it! What can you say? It's a judgement call by the ref, and the ref was closer to the action than we were.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by La Cucaracha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    I think it was a cheap shot and questionable given the timing and circumstances. Kind of greasy imo.

    Having said that Perez is lucky on the one hand that he never lost a point for all of those Hockey shoulders/door openers he threw and was warned about.

    Its the timing of the call that does not sit well with me.
    It looked to me that the ref was breaking them because of the use of the head, then when the punch followed I think the ref had had enough of the rough housing

    Yeah punch was on its way imo at the exact same time. Maybe I can find a slow gif and he was going forward but Jennings was on the ropes which stopped his momentum but not Mikes. Mike underachieved again just like @Fenster said he would and appears to have a fuel issue and should have never found himself in a position of a point making the difference. I just think it stinks a little because that point gave him an L rather then a draw.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    I think it was a cheap shot and questionable given the timing and circumstances. Kind of greasy imo.

    Having said that Perez is lucky on the one hand that he never lost a point for all of those Hockey shoulders/door openers he threw and was warned about.

    Its the timing of the call that does not sit well with me.
    I think the ref finally said that's it! What can you say? It's a judgement call by the ref, and the ref was closer to the action than we were.

    Nah I dont see it that way as stated above but its all good.
    Last edited by IamInuit; 07-29-2014 at 04:01 PM.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    727
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Harvey Dock screws Mike Perez

    Mike sucked the other night. He was a lazy bstard in the ring and didn't deserve a decision. The fact the the took a point means nothing to the overall fight. Mike lost. His trainer should have told him that ever punch landed would get him a cheeseburger. Might have got some motivation out of his lazy ass then.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Mike Perez is the best HW next to the Klits
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-19-2014, 04:01 PM
  2. Mike Perez vs Magomed Abdusalamov
    By Spicoli in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 11-07-2013, 01:09 PM
  3. Mike Perez fought in may? Wtf, sigh!
    By Vendettos in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-09-2013, 06:01 PM
  4. Where the fuck did Mike Perez go?
    By Vendettos in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-25-2013, 02:04 PM
  5. Mike Perez wins twice in the one night!
    By Phil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 01:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing