Floyd Mayweather 48-0

[imp]

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

Ali had losses and he is still the goat in my opinion for different reasons.

Let's not excuse the fact that retaining that 0 doesnt matter!

Every fighter in history wants to keep their 0 but for whatever reason it doesn't always work out that way.

In this era floyd happens to be undefeated and is the best of THIS era.

Ray leonard has losses but was the best of HIS era..leonard would have loved to remained undefeated but Duran had his number that night.

Floyd doesn't care one tenny-wenny-tinny bit if we care about that "0", he does! Floyd does not give a rat's ass about eras!
Floyd wants that 50-0 record and that's all there is to it, end of story!
Floyd is not stupid, he knows he'll be an ATG and in the Hall of Fame without the 0. And he knows he will be so much more with that 0.
That's a record that will transcend boxing, it will be something extraordinary. People who despise boxing will know about Floyd and that 0! Do not say that 0 does not matter, because in my opinion, it's the only thing that does matter to Floyd.
Who knows when someone with Floyd's talent and hellacious cherry picking abilities will come along again?! Lol Just kidding, there will be plenty of guys come along with his talent. Lol Just fucking with you.
To tell the truth, I don't care much for Floyd, but I'd hate to see him come this close and get separated from that 0.

Floyd cares about his 0 about as much as calzaghe cared about his..

The only threat to floyds 0 is himself.

If he gets old in the ring..its over.

If you was a fighter, you would want to be undefeated as much as anyone else..no one wants to loose.

Manny has had lots of experience in loosing but it still doesn't make him a bad fighter..manny has many flaws but lets hope he can put up a worthwhile performance that can keep his fans from saying he has past it.

[imp]

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

I love carl froch who HAS losses but is he better than JC without any losses.

JC undefeated record meant everything to him and he is arguably one of the best super middles of all time.

Where are you going with this?

[Master]

There will be a rematch if it is mildly close, just to milk it even more.

[goti71]

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

[Master]

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.

[pacfan]

Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:

http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather

But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!

[IamInuit]

I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?

I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.

PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.

I've read its a three fight deal so hopefully we get the skinny. The MGM being sold out in 15 minutes seems to be a lark. Hotels rooms that were 2 bills a night are now 7. Seats that were 250 to 500 are now 3,000 to 5,000. I dont understand the reluctance on this side of the world to hold something like this in an arena. At least that way every day working stiffs that actually follow the sport might be able to go.

[Beanflicker]

There'll be drama but Floyd's boxing and ring IQ is too much for Pac. Pac gets outclassed.

[Julius Rain]

Credit to floyd, he did what he needed to do. Im glad this is over. Pac gave us many glories battles, he deserves the rest of his life a legend. Floyd has now prove he could do it even against the 2nd best boxer of his generation. All floyd fans can now bragvall they want. They have won now.

[Beanz]

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

I love carl froch who HAS losses but is he better than JC without any losses.

JC undefeated record meant everything to him and he is arguably one of the best super middles of all time.

Where are you going with this?

I am not going anywhere ? Even if Froch had never lost and Calzaghe had. I could still rate Calzaghe above him. Floyd seems obsessed by the idea, doesn't mean we have to be.

[erics44]

You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.

if floyd loses he wont be able to say - 49 have tried and like all 49 he will fail

or something along those lines

what a twat

just so i never hear that again i want him to lose