kell brooks next fight..

[hitmanhatton]

half his size for one thts impossible and ur saying mario kinderlan is rubbish i know tht was at amatuer but he was the best p4p amatuer of the last 10 yrs
and kell brook fights worse opponants trust me his debut was against a guy who is 31-220
he fought brian coleman who is 24-141 khans opponants are a higher level and the fact brook didnt stop buckley on his debut is hillarious

[emma]

half his size for one thts impossible and ur saying mario kinderlan is rubbish i know tht was at amatuer but he was the best p4p amatuer of the last 10 yrs
and kell brook fights worse opponants trust me his debut was against a guy who is 31-220
he fought brian coleman who is 24-141 khans opponants are a higher level and the fact brook didnt stop buckley on his debut is hillarious

daniel thorpe was only small compared to amir as was david bailey.i didnt mean kinderlan,hes great, i meant amirs pro opponents.well i cant comment on kells debut as i wasnt there.but come on whos heard of half of amirs opponents noone.the fact that we've never heard of them means we dont know who they've fought before.i mean how do you know their previous opponents were any good?.at least kells opponents wernt from outta space!.

[hitmanhatton]

if anythin there famous for being shite
i mean 31-220 tht is one of the worst record iv ever seen and brook couldnt stop him

[emma]

yeah but how do you know amirs opponants from outta space arnt famous for being shite?.

[emma]

plus amirs opponants david bailey and steve gethin are registered as super featherweight?!!?.

[hitmanhatton]

because there not famous baily was 3-4 i think goin into the fight and not exactly the 31-220 of buckley

[emma]

im not talking about what their opponants record is (well i was).im talking bout amirs opponants arnt strong enough.i mean surely warren can find a decent british lightweight for amir to fight!.

[hitmanhatton]

brooks opponants arnt strong enuff thts why a few of em have been beaten couple of hundred times

[emma]

well kells opponants arnt as bad as amirs i mean at least his can stand a couple of shots. amirs are right wimps.

[hitmanhatton]

ur talking shit now there not as bad as amirs thts why they been beat like 200 times they are shit and reason they cn take the shots is becus brook hits like a bitch

[emma]

how do u know how kell hits,hav u actually seen him fight?.he does not hit like a bitch kells a great puncher.both their opponants havent been great but thats proberley because their both young and just starting in the pro game.but at least kell can take a shot unlike amir. :P

[hitmanhatton]

u really do talk shit love wht evidence have u got that amir cant take shots ? are u stupid or something there is a reason tht amir is better known and its obvious he is just the better fighter

[emma]

didnt u hear about the aba's when amir was put on the canvas?.that the evidence if i ever needed any.i was there mate i saw it happen.the reason amir is more known is because he won silver in the olympics.im not saying amir isnt a good fighter im just saying he needs better opponants.

[hitmanhatton]

ye and brook needs to stop fighting bums who everyone else rips apart

[emma]

well what about that baz carey amir couldnt knock him out but stefy bull put him on his knee.so what does that say about amir?.