Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Ring generalship: A purely subjective scoring criteria?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring generalship: A purely subjective scoring criteria?

    if a fighter throws 5 punches and lands once

    and the other fighter throws 1 and lands it, it being a similar punch to his opponents

    the fighter who threw more should be awarded the round
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    689
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ring generalship: A purely subjective scoring criteria?

    Ring generalship: A purely subjective scoring criteria?
    Yes, it is.

    Kabong started out perfectly illustrating this with :The way (I) view it. even though others posts didn't use the personal pronoun (I), they all proceeded in similar fashion.

    Something Floyd stated that validates the complexities of scoring in boxing as opposed to soccer, basketball, baseball, American football: Boxing along with them are all sports, but boxing isn't a game.

    The analogy of a hard punch vs a soft punch in scoring criteria for example: Does one negate the other? I don't think so. If a punch as soft as it is landed...how do I not score it?

    My example of a soft score vs a hard score is in American football -suppose the Dallas Cowboys score 2 running touchdowns for a 1/2 of a yard (twice) braking the goal line---by the nose of the ball.
    But the Green Bay Packers score 2 touchdowns running 85 yards and 92 yards, then do an end zone dance, brake out the cell phone and call their momma while the cameras surround them.

    One team had 2 soft scores, the other had 2 hard scores. But hey...they both scored!!!

    To put that in perspective of ring generalship.
    Suppose the Dallas Cowboys dominated offensive time out of 60 minutes- by having the ball 40minutes to the Packers 20?

    They IMO would have had field generalship or ring generalship.

    But... time of possession doesn't deem them as the winner-- anymore than one who controls the ring 11 rounds out of 12.

    Bernard Hopkins had TOTALL ring generalship vs Jermaine Taylor I, but yet he didn't get the win.

    Michael Katsidis IMO controlled the pace of the fight, where the fight took place against Casamayor, yet he lost. Truly.

    So I would say Yes ring generalship is a scoring criteria that is NOT absolute. It is not objective like knowing how to score in golf, rugbee, soccer or any other sport that is literally a "game"


    Interesting topic that produced some really well thought out comments, Topic/responses like these: you guys rock.
    Last edited by SlimTrae; 08-21-2015 at 12:17 AM.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. ring generalship tips
    By knocktown in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-15-2014, 12:34 PM
  2. Ring Generalship
    By amat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-13-2014, 11:45 PM
  3. Some old musings on ring generalship
    By Dadi Astthorsson in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-03-2009, 12:42 AM
  4. How do you define Ring Generalship?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 05:30 AM
  5. Define Ring Generalship?!
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-12-2007, 04:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing