I agree with Al, great breakdown however I don't think Hagler saw anyone as compact with the torque of Nigel or that really came as close on the power meter. Hearns could punch but he lost a good portion of the concussive pop he carried at 47 and 54. Marvins prime was most likely in the early 80's and he never faced a shadow of Benn in those years. Same goes for Benn I suppose and most of his notable scraps were 168 but one can include the two weight classes for the purpose of this debate as both could have fought in either and Marvin never had a 168 division. Marvin gets far to much credit imo for beating x welters that were longer in the tooth then he was. I think Nigels power could be a real game changer and this matchup would have made a great trilogy.
Bookmarks