Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,389
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    799
    Cool Clicks

    Default Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch

    His last fight he was dominating Dimitrenko, he had his opponent down in round 1, 2 and round 3.

    His opponent went down and took a knee.. His knee was clearly down then he fired a shot straight into the guys ribs.

    That was the knockout blow, he should have clearly been disqualified

    BUT NOOOO.. protect the prospects, doesn't matter that he was winning clearly he should have been DQd
    Last edited by Vendettos; 12-10-2016 at 12:39 AM.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Good one punch Ko from Joseph Parker
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-09-2014, 01:11 AM
  2. Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  3. I know the answer sounds obvious but.........
    By leftylee in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 07:30 PM
  5. Isn't obvious why hatton's workrate dropped....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing