Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  14
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who was worse for boxing?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 30

Thread: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,371
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    762
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    No one is begging for Floyd to come back. He is manufacturing a comeback fight and trying to stay relevant.
    YOU'RE Begging him to come back! Tick Tock!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Each is or was successful by our own fault to a large degree. I save all blame for disgracing the sport for the ever faithful and all too consistent blind-corrupt judges. Also for promoters who push garbage mismatches.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    681
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Boxers risk their health and lives ever time they step in the ring but they know that when they get in the ring. Do not use that to justify the poor match between Floyd v Manny, 5 years past its sell by date.

    Shockingly poor value fight ever.
    Floyd was like the cowardly kid who waited for his friends to jump into the water before he would so he knew it wasn't too cold

    He waited until Pac hadn't KO'd anyone in years and was no longer the killer he was in 2008. He waited until much lesser fighters were fighting Pac and surviving. Then and only then he agreed to the fight.

    If the fight happened in 2008 I think Pac KO's him... and I'm from Floyd's home town!
    You still think it was floyds fault? Even after pac was obviously lying the whole time?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    These are my two least favorite fighters and I blame both of them in large part for doing horrible damage to boxing.

    Chicken Floyd was very talented but his greatest talent was fighting the right guys at the right time. Ran away from Pac until he was sure he was washed up, and even then had to cheat to win with that shoulder injection and denying Pac one. Fought in a scared way and bored the general public to tears.

    Clinch-ko fought everyone and didn't duck like Floyd, but he fought like a scared man, bored everyone to tears and completely killed the HW division, which is supposed to be boxing's money division.

    They were both so dreadful they made the great champions of the past ashamed they were ever involved in boxing.

    Which one do you think disgraced boxing more?

    EDIT: In terms of their in-ring performances. Outside the ring, there is no question who has the better character between the two!
    There is not even a sliver of a doubt of what you say: they both indeed totally disgraced the sport of boxing for far too long. What a refreshing thing it was when Floyd retired and Fury embarrassed Wlad. It gave boxing a new life.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1035
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Boxers risk their health and lives ever time they step in the ring but they know that when they get in the ring. Do not use that to justify the poor match between Floyd v Manny, 5 years past its sell by date.

    Shockingly poor value fight ever.
    Floyd was like the cowardly kid who waited for his friends to jump into the water before he would so he knew it wasn't too cold

    He waited until Pac hadn't KO'd anyone in years and was no longer the killer he was in 2008. He waited until much lesser fighters were fighting Pac and surviving. Then and only then he agreed to the fight.

    If the fight happened in 2008 I think Pac KO's him... and I'm from Floyd's home town!
    Your confused.

    Hate to drag up old news but there's a video with Freddie roach where he openly admits the reason the first fight never took place was because Pac never agreed to testing in the week of the fight.

    That's old news anyway..Pac lost the fight..it's over now.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    "Who disgraced boxing more" and "Who was worse for boxing" are two questions with entirely different answers for me.

    Who disgraced boxing more?

    Well, if we're talking about disgracing boxing, we have to go outside the ring and look at their behavior. I don't think anyone's got qualms with Wlad's behavior outside of boxing. One could say he was sort of an ambassador to the sport. Well-educated, well-mannered, mostly free of scandals and foolish or illegal behavior. Never been arrested that I know of. Floyd on the other hand, has had all kinds of legal and behavior problems, mostly very well documented. So this is a slam dunk for me. If we're talking disgracing the sport of boxing, I'd have to go with Floyd.

    Who has been worse for boxing?

    Another slam dunk, but in the other direction. Love Floyd or hate him, he's been true to his style of fighting since Day One. Now THAT'S a perfectionist in the art of hitting and not getting hit. He may piss people off by the way he is, but he is/was the consummate boxer. The shoulder rolls, the adapting of his style to his opponent, the alternating between offense and defense, his mastery of the ring. It may not be pretty to some, but he plied his craft well. People accuse him of ducking fighters like Margacheato. Why on Earth would Floyd have to get in the ring with #1 a well-known cheater, and #2 a guy who outweighs him by a bunch, and probably would even more on fight night? Just cause Pacquiao (bless his soul) got in the ring with Cheato and busted his eye socket doesn't mean Floyd was obligated to do the same thing. So to the detractors of Floyd, this ducking business is a bit mild and overstated. He fought some very big names, at some very good times. He def should've faced Pac earlier in his career, but it is what it is. I don't think boxing was any worse off because of Floyd. Now Wlad, on the other hand, single-handedly brought down the HW division. After getting KTFO'ed a few times early on, he changed his style to one of a scared rabbit. He clinched, he mauled, he fouled, he did everything possible to turn every single goddamn HW title fight into a boring, exasperating spectacle. The examples are too many. Sultan, Haye, Povetkin, Fury..... all were forgettable, mostly because of Wlad's reluctance to engage. So who was worse for boxing? Without a doubt...... Wlad.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    "Who disgraced boxing more" and "Who was worse for boxing" are two questions with entirely different answers for me.

    Who disgraced boxing more?

    Well, if we're talking about disgracing boxing, we have to go outside the ring and look at their behavior. I don't think anyone's got qualms with Wlad's behavior outside of boxing. One could say he was sort of an ambassador to the sport. Well-educated, well-mannered, mostly free of scandals and foolish or illegal behavior. Never been arrested that I know of. Floyd on the other hand, has had all kinds of legal and behavior problems, mostly very well documented. So this is a slam dunk for me. If we're talking disgracing the sport of boxing, I'd have to go with Floyd.

    Who has been worse for boxing?

    Another slam dunk, but in the other direction. Love Floyd or hate him, he's been true to his style of fighting since Day One. Now THAT'S a perfectionist in the art of hitting and not getting hit. He may piss people off by the way he is, but he is/was the consummate boxer. The shoulder rolls, the adapting of his style to his opponent, the alternating between offense and defense, his mastery of the ring. It may not be pretty to some, but he plied his craft well. People accuse him of ducking fighters like Margacheato. Why on Earth would Floyd have to get in the ring with #1 a well-known cheater, and #2 a guy who outweighs him by a bunch, and probably would even more on fight night? Just cause Pacquiao (bless his soul) got in the ring with Cheato and busted his eye socket doesn't mean Floyd was obligated to do the same thing. So to the detractors of Floyd, this ducking business is a bit mild and overstated. He fought some very big names, at some very good times. He def should've faced Pac earlier in his career, but it is what it is. I don't think boxing was any worse off because of Floyd. Now Wlad, on the other hand, single-handedly brought down the HW division. After getting KTFO'ed a few times early on, he changed his style to one of a scared rabbit. He clinched, he mauled, he fouled, he did everything possible to turn every single goddamn HW title fight into a boring, exasperating spectacle. The examples are too many. Sultan, Haye, Povetkin, Fury..... all were forgettable, mostly because of Wlad's reluctance to engage. So who was worse for boxing? Without a doubt...... Wlad.

    I would have loved to see a prime Tito get his hands on Floyd.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Floyd has the most boring number ppv fights in the history of the sport. Therefore it is the money man. Floyd is just waiting and hoping people will forget the dull fights he has had so that they can buy his next 50th one.

    Floyd is the hoping "you all must have forgot"
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Floyd has the most boring number ppv fights in the history of the sport. Therefore it is the money man. Floyd is just waiting and hoping people will forget the dull fights he has had so that they can buy his next 50th one.

    Floyd is the hoping "you all must have forgot"

    Buying a Floyd PPV is like going to a nice restaurant, ordering your food and the server comes out, drops trow and pinches a loaf right on your plate!

    I've never paid to see a Floyd fight and never would! Horrible value for your buck

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    902
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    I would have loved to see a prime Tito get his hands on Floyd.
    Tito doesn't even connect with Floyd. Floyd was too quick, too good on his feet, and too smart to let Tito even land.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    I would have loved to see a prime Tito get his hands on Floyd.
    Tito doesn't even connect with Floyd. Floyd was too quick, too good on his feet, and too smart to let Tito even land.

    Over 12 rounds Trinidad will land. Also doesn't have to worry about much coming back in the way of power.
    Prime Trinidad was light-years better than Canelo, and even Canelo managed to land one or two the whole fight.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by vidgil View Post
    I would have loved to see a prime Tito get his hands on Floyd.
    Tito doesn't even connect with Floyd. Floyd was too quick, too good on his feet, and too smart to let Tito even land.
    Tito would never land because Floyd would never fight him

    Otherwise he'd get put to sleep by one of those left hooks.

    Even washed up Mosley had Floyd dancing like a fish!

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    If Tito landed then Floyd would be wobbling and for anyone mentioning Oscar, they should remember he was taller and stronger than Floyd was.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    If Tito landed then Floyd would be wobbling and for anyone mentioning Oscar, they should remember he was taller and stronger than Floyd was.
    If a washed up, drunk, cocaine-abusing, cross dressing Oscar could almost beat Floyd, I can only imagine what he would have done to Floyd if he was closer to his prime!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who disgraced boxing more: Clinch-ko or Chicken Floyd?

    Come to think of it, Chicken Floyd always seemed to have a problem with men who wear women's panties. Chop Chop Corley also had him hurt bad in their fight!


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Clinch-ko paid the judges to NOT disqualify him
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-04-2017, 06:32 AM
  2. What will Clinch-ko's legacy be?
    By vidgil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 01-04-2017, 04:23 AM
  3. Why is Floyd never warned for his Chicken-Wing Elbow thrusts?
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-04-2014, 10:08 AM
  4. Floyd: The $8m Chicken
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 08:38 PM
  5. RJJ needs to learn how to clinch...
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 12:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing