Re: Keith Thurman vs. Danny Garcia.
I don't think Garcia is quite as bad as everyone makes him out to be. He'ds got decent counterpunching fundamentals and has used that to maximize his chances at winning by baiting and trapping faster fighters like Khan, by luring them into a firefight he knows he can win. Hes faced a softy or two while extending his reign and had definitely benefited from a decision once or twice.
The thing about thurman is he seems to enjoy talking the talk more than he does walking the walk. He relishes having natural advantages (age, speed, power) in there on some opponents and exploits those to the fullest. That's the idea... there's nothing wrong with that. Once he encounters too much resistance, he seems to reevaluate whether or not its worth the trouble to close a show.
So that being said i think this fight will be decided in the early rounds, with thurman picking at garcia and trying to build a lead. Garcia can be a notoriously slow starter till he finds his range and gets comfortable. So I think Thurman builds a lead over the first 4 or 5. Garcia settles down and lands something on thurman that gives him something to think about over the next 2 or 3 rounds and thurman losing points while he circles and thinks. and then Thurman gets on a bike and potshots down the stretch after realizing its not worth it to stand there and trade with a kid who's loading up an a hail mary shot. Just my 2...
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
Bookmarks