How quick its done is irrelevant. A strange statement from yourself..Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
How quick its done is irrelevant. A strange statement from yourself..Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
What you need to factor in, IMO; is that as awesome a force prime 86 to 88 Tyson was, he had them flaws that he showed later in his career, even then.Originally Posted by miles
If he had met a Prime Holmes in 88 rather than a 38 year old Holmes, them faults would of shown though. Tyson would struggle in a fight in which he would not be able dominate, even in 88; there is no evidence to prove otherwise. If you stood up to Tyson and competed evenly with him for half a dozen rounds, you beat him.
Miles I agree that any smaller HW or slugger variety(excluding foreman and maybe Louis) would be picked to lose to Tyson(Liston, Dempsey, Frazier, Marciano, Pattterson) On the other hand I think the bigger rangy boxer top ten HW's would be picked to beat him.(Ali, Johnson, Holmes, Bowe, Lewis).
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
BK, I know you are not Tysons biggest fan, but Tyson faced difficult fighters and simply outworked his opponents for decisions. Tyson could do this against Holmes.Originally Posted by Britkid
Holmes at his best would try and toy with Tyson, and he would get clocked. Prime Holmes would not beat Tyson...at Tysons worst Tyson wins a decision...
Depends on which Tyson we are talking aboutOriginally Posted by VanChilds
worst tyson wins by decision what are u on about seems like ur tyson fan and not biggest fan of holmes![]()
The fights against Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis suggest otherwise, they showed Tyson could not cope fighting evenly with someone and finding a way to win, he always lost. A prime Holmes would merely add another name to that list.Originally Posted by miles
I think any Tyson loses to the guys I mentioned.Originally Posted by miles
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
IMO only the Douglas victory has any real meritOriginally Posted by Britkid
I think tyson gives everysingle one of them a lot of trouble beating them.Originally Posted by VanChilds
I speak as a fan of boxing first and then my opinions about fighters plays an effect....Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
No Holmes was boring IMO....
firstly holmes wasnt boring he was in quite few wars secondly how does douglas loss have only real merit holyfield beat him and holyfield was older funny thing is if mike tyson would of won people wouldnt have been saying he was shot in holyfield fight simple thing is tyson was champ at that time he was blasting threw hes opponents so how hell was he past it
That's a long sentence and its possibly unintelligable....Holmes was more interesting than that!!Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
![]()
![]()
well i dont want to go all into it otherwise would be hell of alot of typing![]()
why are you on a forum then? Its about typing to make yourself understood. You cant do that then you should find a hobby...Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks