Should Lampley have said something about the alleged charges agaianst him?

**Hulk** · 01-23-2007 07:42 AM

Originally Posted by Majesty

Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'

Originally Posted by Majesty

But it never happens that way. HBO is a double standard for who they want to succeed and who they want to fail. You see the excuses they gave Hatton for fighting a smart fight holding Urango and going for clinches and making it sound exciting

But they give Ruiz holy hell for doing it. And they'd throw Mayweather over a bridge for fightign a smart fight calling it "not fair'

You're kidding right?

you ain't never lied

Don't expect HBO to be unbiased. Oscar ran for the last 2 rounds against Trinidad barely throwing a punch and they didnt give him as bad a thrashing as they gave mayweather for throwing punches

That's cus Oscar is "The Golden Boy", and can do no wrong.

**CutMeMick** · 01-23-2007 08:07 AM

No.
Thats his personal business theres no reason why he should mention something of his personal life on a broadcast.
Where hes there to work and comment on a fight. The broadcast that HBO was doing was about a sport his personal life has NOTHING to do with what the broadcast was about.

**HMSARES** · 01-23-2007 11:20 PM

Lampley should do the good old fashioned American "Perp Walk," handcuffs and all.

**Wacko3205** · 01-23-2007 11:32 PM

Originally Posted by Ted The Bull

Appraently Lampley and his cronies believe silence is golden. What do you think?

Unless the two of them were in the ring nEked mud wrAstlin & he was slamming her face in the mud over & over & over & yelling "Take that you dirty batch!!! That'll teach you to give it up over a hard eight with some twenty year old at the craps table insteada comin home wif duh Lamps!!! Roll tha dice on that!!!"

You know he said it...don't act like he didn't. I'll betcha Lamps is harder then 50 Cents after a sneakee on the glass winky. Crack...it get's em everytime.

All kidding aside...NO. He was wise & so was HBO to keep that mess on the lockdown...no one knows the true story of what went on between the two of them but the two of them.

She could started it & it just all escalated...anywho...where are those shots of that broad...ole' Wacky

wouldn't mind seeing those again.

Put 'em up if ya's got em.

But seriously Ted, since I know you want me to give you a serious answer, no he shouldn't have said peep while they were doing biz. Most of the outside world (the one's not on the wire...if those type's still live & breath what we all call air) is unaware of this mess...HBO probably wants to keep it that way.

They'll throw a shitload of cash her way & that will be that.

**Wacko3205** · 01-23-2007 11:33 PM

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

No.
Thats his personal business theres no reason why he should mention something of his personal life on a broadcast.
Where hes there to work and comment on a fight. The broadcast that HBO was doing was about a sport his personal life has NOTHING to do with what the broadcast was about.

Agreed 100%.

**tedsares** · 01-24-2007 01:41 AM

They'll throw a shitload of cash her way & that will be that.

Yes, indeed. Maybe worth taking a shot or two from "Kid Lamp."

**smashcrusher** · 01-24-2007 03:40 AM

Frank Gifford didn't say anything about his scandal while commentating Monday Night Football, Marv Albert didn't say anything about his crossdressing incident in the NBA, so Lampley shouldn't either. Where would he get his balls big enough to even think his personal life deserves national airtime?

**tedsares** · 01-24-2007 04:08 AM

Didn't Albert do more than cross dress? Something about snacking...

**The Boxer** · 01-24-2007 05:32 AM

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

No.
Thats his personal business theres no reason why he should mention something of his personal life on a broadcast.
Where hes there to work and comment on a fight. The broadcast that HBO was doing was about a sport his personal life has NOTHING to do with what the broadcast was about.

all i'm saying is this lampley and merchant have no problem bringin up everybody else personal business. now when the spotlight on lampley it's time out.

**tedsares** · 01-24-2007 07:02 AM

Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

No.
Thats his personal business theres no reason why he should mention something of his personal life on a broadcast.
Where hes there to work and comment on a fight. The broadcast that HBO was doing was about a sport his personal life has NOTHING to do with what the broadcast was about.

all i'm saying is this and merchant have no problem bringin up everybody else personal business. now when the spotlight on lampley it's time out.

I can dig that boxer!

**CutMeMick** · 01-24-2007 08:18 AM

Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

No.
Thats his personal business theres no reason why he should mention something of his personal life on a broadcast.
Where hes there to work and comment on a fight. The broadcast that HBO was doing was about a sport his personal life has NOTHING to do with what the broadcast was about.

all i'm saying is this and merchant have no problem bringin up everybody else personal business. now when the spotlight on lampley it's time out.

He comments on the lifes of Boxers which is what he gets paid to do.
The media, talks about celebrities which is what they get paid to do.
If Lampley was to comment on the matter it would be on another show/program. Not where he works it's not like he owns HBO and he has a saying on what goes on air and what doesn't.
He probably mentioned it and HBO execs. said NO, thats not our business you handle that matter on your own time.....