It wont happen on neutral ground. That doesn't make sense. They're big names in their countries, and the boxing world, nowhere else.Originally Posted by killersheep
I was wonderingBut it would be me and my dog![]()
Mick or VD?
Joke![]()
It wont happen on neutral ground. That doesn't make sense. They're big names in their countries, and the boxing world, nowhere else.Originally Posted by killersheep
I was wonderingBut it would be me and my dog![]()
Mick or VD?
Joke![]()
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Joe already HAS relinquished the IBF strap. He did so, to make the great Manfredo fight possible. The window of oppertunity for a 4 belt unification is gone for now.Originally Posted by jbirdy
But Kessler-Calzaghe would still be the closests the division has ever come to complete unification and having an undisputed champ.
like it or not calzaghe is the ring champion and the undisputed champion, thats what the ring belt means. there neevr was a window to get all 4 abc betls on one champion, kessler would of have to dropped the wbc had he faced calzaghe,a nd the ibf would of still stripped calzaghe of the IBF belt - also if kessler gets stripped of the wbc i *think* am not certain he losses the WBA super champion status also - leaving him beltless.Originally Posted by dumdane
Whoa! Whoa! I'm nobody's dog.Originally Posted by Fenster
And so you know WackOff3205 my bitch!![]()
No the ring belt does NOT mean undisputed. The ring is helt in higher regard than the alphabet titles by most. But it's not without flaws. Especially in the case of Calzaghe, where it was awarded prematurely without Calzaghe fighting the no 2 ranked and whgere Calzaghe seems contend to rest on his laurels with the Ring pretty much powerless to force anything.Originally Posted by Preme
Undisputed means having no credible rival. That is clearly not the case here.
If in fact Calzaghe believes he has no credible rival, he should have no problem taking on Kessler, finishing him off and walk away with his belts without breaking sweat. Even if it's not a big earner i could at least be as good (also financially) as most of the other opponents we've seen (and continues to see) Joe fight.
Just wanna add.
How can you even remotely consider calling Calzaghe undisputed when numerous polls across the various forums suggest a 50-50 split, regarding who ppl would favour to win. When an increasing number of boxing observers and writers either have them dead even or in many cases are starting to have Kessler ahead of Calzaghe?
I may be biased - but that's just ridiculous.
I dunno why Killersheep was calling you a dog either MickOriginally Posted by CutMeMicK
Now VD on the other hand
natural.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Most fans don't seem to understand the "fight" that takes place before THE fight. And the EGOS involved.Originally Posted by dumdane
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
kessler by tko
Well there is no doubt that Kessler is trying to meet Calzaghe. I had the change to chat with Kessler after the Andrade fight. I asked why they kept chasing Calzaghe when the managers cant agree about a fight. Kessler said he didn´t mind going to Wales to fight as long the money where right. How much that is I don't know, but he is determent to get it on with Calzaghe, even in Cardiff.
He also hoped that HBO would put the pressure on Calzaghe in order to make the fight, I don't know if HBO have the power to do just that.
But anyway they do plan that Kessler next time should fight in US against a top ranked American fighter. They dream of B Hop. that would be funny if they stole Calzaghe opponent
I believe he instead should pay Mundine a visit downunder. Pretty sure there would be a great deal of money in thatand I like to see that fight. Mundine have evolved since the last visit. But again there are plenty of 0 to go in the SMW just now, maybe Kessler should take all the 0´s on one by one
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks