Go too http://www.cooltext.com they got loads of great logos on there. then upload your text to http://www.tinypic.comOriginally Posted by TheBESTP4P
Go too http://www.cooltext.com they got loads of great logos on there. then upload your text to http://www.tinypic.comOriginally Posted by TheBESTP4P
I think Roy Jones is. Has has done it all has pretty much fought all there is to fight. Maybee he can meet Calzaghe at a catch weight. Well then again Calzaghe can duck them pretty good. Look at Kessler.
[SIGPIC][SIGPIC]
Double M Michael Moorer
Well who knows. I might be wrong. The signature fight thing might be overrated. Bob Foster doesn't have that many signature fights. Well he does have the Dick Tiger fight. Your exciting fighters have more signature fights. The 80s had alot of signature fights, more than most eras I think, and the 40s.Originally Posted by brazilianbomber
But if you look at skill and if you did a round robin with all these guys, Roy Jones and Virgil Hill might have done ok. Obviously Roy beat Virgil, but Virgil was good also when he was from 1989-1994 or so. I think the Roy/Virgil era is underrated because many people think the opponents they fought were not the level of a guy like Foster. I disagree. Virgil fought Stewart, Czyz,Thomas Hearns, Frank Tate, Tiozzo,Maske,Devalle, Roy Jones,Lalonde,Mormeck and the list goes on and on, Roy Jones Jr. fought Hopkins, James Toney, McCallum,Griffin,Virgil Hill,Devalle,Harding,Tarver,Ruiz, and Glen Johnson. So Virgil and Roy fought every good fighter who came through the light heavyweight division since the late 80s to now.. 20 years of fighters. So they must be good. But somehow Spinks and Charles and Foster control the rankings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks