Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?

    40+ I'll say---------

    1) Hop-- Still lookin sharp in all phases.

    2) Moore-- The Ol' Mongoose beat Durelle in a LHW title defense, a draw with Willie Pastrano, & put Marciano down.

    3) Foreman-- Was being outboxed by Moorer but the end result is what counts. HW champ @ 45 yrs of age.

    I wouldn't try to argue flip flopping these 3 guys in any position to be quite honest. Especially Hop & Moore.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1000
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?

    I was never a big fan, but I can't help but be impressed with him. I wouldn't say he is still primed, but IMO he can box at a higher level than any 40+ year old that I have ever witnessed.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?

    Quote Originally Posted by lb4lb
    I was never a big fan, but I can't help but be impressed with him. I wouldn't say he is still primed, but IMO he can box at a higher level than any 40+ year old that I have ever witnessed.
    The word "prime" is a tough word because many people use different definitions. If we are talkin purely physical then a 42 yr old guy is not in his "prime". When u add in the mental aspects then the fighter could be in his "prime".

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1000
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?

    Quote Originally Posted by silent assassin
    Quote Originally Posted by lb4lb
    I was never a big fan, but I can't help but be impressed with him. I wouldn't say he is still primed, but IMO he can box at a higher level than any 40+ year old that I have ever witnessed.
    The word "prime" is a tough word because many people use different definitions. If we are talkin purely physical then a 42 yr old guy is not in his "prime". When u add in the mental aspects then the fighter could be in his "prime".
    Good point. He probably is mentally stonger than he ever was, but IMO I would have to say that he was the most dominating in the late 90's or early 2000's. Don't get me wrong he has not declined by much as he has found a way to slow down aging.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing