Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 97

Thread: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1142
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    Honestly, these are two of the stupidest questions I've read. Are you serious or are these questions some kind of backlash against the Pac fanatics?

    How would boxing be better off without Manny? He is one of the marquee names in the sport, entertaining as hell, and his name is involved in the some the most desirable matchups in the foreseeable future.



    So yeah, boxing would be better without Manny. it would have been better without ODLH. it would have been better without any fighter who attracts attention and excitement to the sport.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1481
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cortez The Killer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    Honestly, these are two of the stupidest questions I've read. Are you serious or are these questions some kind of backlash against the Pac fanatics?

    How would boxing be better off without Manny? He is one of the marquee names in the sport, entertaining as hell, and his name is involved in the some the most desirable matchups in the foreseeable future.



    So yeah, boxing would be better without Manny. it would have been better without ODLH. it would have been better without any fighter who attracts attention and excitement to the sport.

    exactly

    he may as well just asked the question would boxing be better off without good boxers

    This is both retarded and insane....i say we ban bulldog for the sole purpose of being a twat
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    284
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.


    Bless your heart.....your so ignorant! I mean really, every post you write sounds like its from an eight year old. Do you realize that if Pacquiao and Mayweather end up fighting, that it will likely sell the most PPV's in history? Do you realize how many fans Pacquiao puts in the stands? Like its bad that some like him and some dont? Thats what its all about man! He's the most entertaining boxer there is in the ring, there's always gonna be knockdowns when Paquiao's in the ring and thats exactly what boxing needs to become more popular. Do yourself a favor and go build a mud castle outside and stop embarrassing yourself on this forum!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,894
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    How can Manny be "bad for boxing"? Honestly, I don't get what's behind the question. NO, Manny's not bad for boxing. He has attracted tons of new fans, and he's dominated in a way that few boxers dominate. And right now he's the hottest draw in boxing.

    A better question would be: "Are fanatical Pacquiao fans bad for boxing?" And although I'd be tempted to say "yes", I'll even go the other way there. Sure, they can be downright obnoxious. But in a way, isn't that what gives a little spice to forums such as these? After all, if we didn't have clueless Pacquiao fans to beat up on once in a while, what fun would it be?


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1993
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    How can Manny be "bad for boxing"? Honestly, I don't get what's behind the question. NO, Manny's not bad for boxing. He has attracted tons of new fans, and he's dominated in a way that few boxers dominate. And right now he's the hottest draw in boxing.

    A better question would be: "Are fanatical Pacquiao fans bad for boxing?" And although I'd be tempted to say "yes", I'll even go the other way there. Sure, they can be downright obnoxious. But in a way, isn't that what gives a little spice to forums such as these? After all, if we didn't have clueless Pacquiao fans to beat up on once in a while, what fun would it be?

    the same way some posters like to start fights and watch the little people go to work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing?
    No.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Manny Pacquiao Bad For Boxing?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Manny "Pacman" Pacquaio has greatly divided the boxing community into different factions. Those for him and against him. Many of those fans in his camp think he's the greatest thing since slice bread. And then there are those fans that just don't like him for whatever reason.

    This is a serious question because of many boxing fans have called Manny Pacquiao a pussy and coward for wanting to fight Cotto at a catchweight, which would be his first. To be fair I never considered the Oscar fight a catchweight because you can't expect someone to jump 3 weight classes from 135 to fight you when you called him out and it was at the 147 ww limit. So there are endless discussions about the Pacman for or against him in every boxing forum.

    So is Manny Pacquiao bad for boxing? Would boxing be better if Manny Pacquiao never picked up the sport?

    Discuss.
    No. He's bad as a pet owner. But not for Boxing

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 08:14 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-02-2008, 05:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing