Bert Sugar on Mike Tyson, his legacy and chances against the Klitchko's

[piye]

I think we can agree to disagree, both brothers are very good but have never beaten anyone of note. Vitali had the chance to and he lost so you can' give credit to these guys for how you think they may have stood up.

The Holmes that Tyson beat had more left in the tank than the Lewis that Vitali fought, Razor Rudock was better than Haye and Peter, Tim wither spoon and Bruno are miles better than Tony Thompson and Thomas Adamek and there is no one of the quality of a Michael spinks on the record of the brothers Grim why do they deserve credit when they have beaten no one of note?

[El Kabong]

I think we can agree to disagree, both brothers are very good but have never beaten anyone of note. Vitali had the chance to and he lost so you can' give credit to these guys for how you think they may have stood up.

The Holmes that Tyson beat had more left in the tank than the Lewis that Vitali fought, Razor Rudock was better than Haye and Peter, Tim wither spoon and Bruno are miles better than Tony Thompson and Thomas Adamek and there is no one of the quality of a Michael spinks on the record of the brothers Grim why do they deserve credit when they have beaten no one of note?

I declare shenanigans on Holmes having more left in the tank than Lewis. Ruddock was exactly like Sam Peter, he had weight issues, but Ruddock also had a dodgey chin and stamina. Razor was a more dynamic puncher, but that was all.

You can't chose who's in your era, the Klitschko brothers have fought and beaten everyone they can, you can't bring up guys they never had a chance to fight, that's fucking idiotic.