When I originally watched the fight I watched as a fan and guessed it a 7-5 or 8-4 Pac. I rewatched the fight as a judge instead of a spectator. I also looked at it from a biased standpoint for both fighters. Not a ridiculous bias but just leaning/favoring one over the other. My results are when I favored Pac I could give him 7 rounds I felt good about and 3 more that made me feel uneasy. When I favored Bradley I saw 3 that I felt good about but I couldn't give him more than 5 total rounds.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes:
Reply With Quote



From what I've seen though Bradley didn't seem as dominated as I'd read up on but alot of that seems to stem from how negatively he was fighting at times. I think the whole "bend at the waist below the belt when I see an exchange coming that I haven't initiated" needs to be phased out of the sport. Either that or you flat out rabbit punch the guy as soon he does it (but your not allowed to punch a guy in the back who is deliberately presenting it
) I don't mind if its done to set up a counter uppercut or blended into a weave to set up a left-hook but when a fighter does it to simply set up a clinch he should at least be warned. Hate to say it but I'd pay to see a boxer try that one too many times and get straight up kicked in the face. It just slows down the fight down to such a tedious pace and makes a guy nervous not to throw because he will be countered but because its just a waste of time. Anyway, back to trawling through the shit before HBO nets even that up...
Im done here Pare.
Bookmarks