Re: GGG v Kell Brook 10th September - confirmed

Originally Posted by
p4pking
147 to 160 is a big ask of any fighter, this is really surprising and I can't see how it's competitive

I rate Brook highly, but I'm not sure how he'd do at 154, what is this all about? Also wonder whether Canelo-Brook was talked about? That would have been a very interesting, competitive fight at 154.
I wouldn't be surprised if golden boy nosed it around before slumping away uninterested... based on Brooks performance against Porter was is more actively aggressive than canelo. Probably figured it wouldn't be a floyd shut out but Brooks chances at slipping turning countering and stepping away probably gave him a better chance at pulling off an upset.
When comparing khan with brook. Ones got a title, a slicker style but probably wont leave England for that fight. The other has had his clock cleaned a couple of times and an almost guaranteed lapse in concentration and his eyes are usually bigger than his stomach so he won't know he bit off more than he can chew till he chokes on it. Easy pickin's for a upgraded less plodding boxer/puncher type.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
Bookmarks