Since when has the IBF been a crap title? Lennox held it! WBO and IBO I can understand but the IBF...pleaseOriginally Posted by Britkid
Since when has the IBF been a crap title? Lennox held it! WBO and IBO I can understand but the IBF...pleaseOriginally Posted by Britkid
IBF is without doubt the proven most corrupt of all the alphabet organizations. Bob Lee did time for the corruption in that organization!!!!Originally Posted by Lyle
![]()
Well fine RIDDLE ME THIS, what title holder right now could beat Wlad?
I have already said Wlad is the #1 contender for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. I would like to see him fight either Rahman or Lyakhovich, so the winner can claim the vacant Heavyweight Championship of the World.Originally Posted by Lyle
And providing he prepares properly and listens to Manny, he should be capable of beating either...fairly easily.
Originally Posted by wladimirISback
very very good post. ive always felt that lennox was a phony. i also feel that wlad OR viatli would beat himon any day of the week(injurys not withstanding)
Then what happened on June 21, 2003; when Vitali had an opportunity to put that theory to the test, and failed?Originally Posted by K2-Promotion
![]()
It seems people like to make losing winning Britkid. Sure Vitali was winning on points but it was Lennox that cut him up with a punch, lets Say Byrd had built a lead up(by 2 rounds) to the 10th round an Wlad had won the previous 2 rounds and was starting to take control and Byrd's eye was cut very bad and the ref and doctor decided to stop it. Now, the Klit fans would be on here saying "Wlad was gonna win, he was just starting to come on."![]()
*looks at the first post* *sharpens axe* on second thought..nope..its not worth it![]()
Exactly Starr; a victory on a cut caused by a punch always has been a TKO. Hell before 1988 a victory on a cut by any means, fair or foul went down as a TKO win, and everyone just accepted it.Originally Posted by Starr
Imagine Minter/Hagler went down as a technical draw three? The dominant Middleweight of the 80s, possibly would have retired, never being a World Champ....
well byrds cut came from klitschko DOMINATING and scoring 2 knockdowns, and vitali was winning on ALL 3 SCORECARDS!!!
maybee if the fight was in nevada lennox would have a chance at being ahead on cards, but vitali was still going strong WITH that cut, he was not begining to wane and if he had not been cut he would have been even less likley to perform poorly as the fight went on
1: Vitali choose to quit against ByrdOriginally Posted by SalTheButcher
2: A cut caused by a fist, that leads to fight being stopped is a TKO win. The argument that Vitali was giving Lewis a hard fight and would of won, but for the cut, is the equivalent of saying Holmes was giving Tyson all he could handle, and if it was them three knockdowns he would of beaten Iron Mike; or if Spinks was not caught by them big punches he would of beaten Tyson; or Grant was doing great against Lewis, if you take out the knockdowns; or Frazier was planning to get knockdown half a dozen times by Foreman, so he could lead him into a false sense of security or Duran was on the verge of beating Hearns but for....![]()
HELL NO, spinks wasnt giving tyson all he could handle...
vitali was WINNING, reguardless, and he didnt quit with a cut that would have made many give the ref the "i quit but im too scared to say it so wave it off" look
there is a big difference between not being able to move your arm w/o causing permanent damage and a cut
i dont say vitali won, just that he would have, and that he ws willing to lose his sight to beat lennox, and that he would CRUSH him in a rematch
I am saying Spinks would have won had he avoided Tyson's power punches, and Holmes would of beaten Tyson, but for the knockdowns, and Grant would of beaten Lewis, but for the knockdowns, and Frazier would of beaten Foreman, but for the knockdowns, and Duran would of beaten Hearns but for knockdowns....Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
![]()
my bad, i didnt mean spinks, i meant
HELL NO holmes wasnt beating tyson
he was in over his head and like 45 by the time that fight went down
Did you see the start of the fourth? Holmes was bouncing away on his toes, shuffling along, and bemusing his young rivalOriginally Posted by SalTheButcher
![]()
Just figured I would fix up your quote so everyone knew what you meant there ISback. Have a sad click on me.Originally Posted by wladimirISback
Formerly LuciferTheGreat
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks