No I am saying it is a strategy. but an illegal stradigy.which should be penalized .. Dude you could say that throwing low blows is a strategy, does not make it legal mate !Originally Posted by Lyle
No I am saying it is a strategy. but an illegal stradigy.which should be penalized .. Dude you could say that throwing low blows is a strategy, does not make it legal mate !Originally Posted by Lyle
Yes but low blows HURT people clinching DOESN'T......next argument
REGULATORY GUIDELINES AND RULES FOR ALLOriginally Posted by Lyle
WORLD AND REGIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP BOUTS
A foul is an action by a boxer, identified by the referee, that does not meet the standard of a fair blow or the conduct of a responsible professional fighter. Fouls may include, but are not limited to, the following types of contact or acts:
#4 Holding or deliberately maintaining a clinch;
now lets go to the next argument
You type like you're illiterate and I'm the idiot. You get mad every time I tell you the truth and get all worked up but just cause you get mad, that doesn't mean the truth is gonna stop being the truth. I know alot more about boxing than you do. I'm a fan of guys but when they're flaws come up in topic, I don't try to cover it up by quoting commentators and comparing them to all time greats. He is far from a great fighter. If you can't win without holding, you really do suck.Originally Posted by Lyle
Francisco "The Wizard" Palacios
WBA Fedelatin Champ -WBC #1 Contender
21-1* (13 K.O.s) Cruiserweight
At this point in Wlad's career, there's no one who can out hug him either. Not even John Ruiz.Originally Posted by Lyle
Francisco "The Wizard" Palacios
WBA Fedelatin Champ -WBC #1 Contender
21-1* (13 K.O.s) Cruiserweight
Yes, but Wlad doesn't just clinch, he RIDES his opponents. Often jumping up then coming down on their necks and backs with his whole 250 + lbs. Its a cowardly and illegal tactic. I've seen Ali do similiar tactics, not to mention pick at cuts, and I do not like watching him do it either. Wlad is not flawless, and as others have said, much like Jermain Taylor, is a very good hype job by HBO. Only time Wlad has ever impressed me at all was in defeating Sam Peter, who was raw, but a huge puncher none the less.Originally Posted by Lyle
"You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"
Yep.......his success is due entirely to hugging......give me a break and be honest with yourself. The man is beating everyone out there because of skill.Originally Posted by Bx730NY
WTF
Its not all skill. Its equal parts of skill and strategy. We all know Wlad is great offensively but not defensively. With the grabbing strategy it has allowed Wlad the ability to stay in the fight a longer, especially after he has gotten tagged.Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
You must be the change you want to see in the world. --Mahatma Gandhi
It's interesting that Wlad was all but washed up before the Peter fight, and now is the best fighter in the division!
The man probably has the most talent in the division right now, at least at this level. He has monster power, great hand speed, and a good mix of punches. One of his most overlooked attributes is his excellent footwork. He is by no means washed up!
With that being said, I still don't think he'll stay at the top very long. For whatever reason, he folds under pressure. He did really well against Peter in that regard, hanging in there until it even looked like he caught a third wind. Also, lots of people here are complaining about Peter hitting him in the back of the head. Am I the only one who saw Wlad turning his back to Peter? I've watched that fight several times, and most of those shots were at least partially due to Wlad turning away from the punches. In any event, if Wlad gets caught by a solid punch, it really rattles him.
Another thing - the Peter fight isn't a good indicator of future success against heavy punchers. Why? Peter is in fact a heavy handed puncher, no doubt - but his punches are terribly slow. That's a good reason why Briggs might very well pose the biggest threat to Wlad's comeback to this point. He's WAY faster than Peter. He's nowhere near as heavy handed, but Briggs can still throw. Add that to the similar reach and height, and Wlad might be in for a tougher fight than expected.
With all that said, I'll still put my money on Wlad for this one...but I think it will be a good indicator of where Wlad really is at this point, where his last two fights weren't quite as illuminating.
As for the clinching, my opinion is that excessive clinching - a la Ruiz - should NOT be allowed. I think the Wlad/Byrd fight wasn't quite that bad, although it's still not my favorite. It is an intelligent component to be used, though.
You need to be honest with yourself because if you can't see that Wlad's recent success is due to holding, then you're just biased. You really think he would have beaten Peter if he didn't hold him to death? Seriously now.Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
Francisco "The Wizard" Palacios
WBA Fedelatin Champ -WBC #1 Contender
21-1* (13 K.O.s) Cruiserweight
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
So his success against Byrd was holding.....
NO open your eyes.....he has KO power and his recent success has been due to movement, speed, power and establishing a sturdy frequent jab...all of the elements that make a fighter great
But all of the people that have never liked Wlad always find some bullshat reason to discredit all the skills...
Ali held yet he was "the greatest of all time"
Holyfields famous win over Tyson was a fucking hug fest that far far far exceeded the number of holds Wlad has had in any fight.
Peter got two gift Knockdowns which were to the back of the head and one legit and Wlad still boxed cirlces around him and outpointed him by a gross margin.
My question to you is this...name one other heavy in the division who has more skills than Wlad and the attributes that you feel stand out!!
Wlad=boxing skills multiple tools that I have already listed earlier in the thread and I'm not going to list again.
Sam Peter= Strongly built with chin and clubbing punch that is better suited for a tough-man competition.
The haters are always going to find a reason to hate a boxer they never liked in the first place.
The guy is the best out there-- deal with it.
Wlad is good people, I like him, but he is a hugging S.O.B. I like him when he fight taller fighters because there is not as much hugging and more fighting, It not his fault, they the Ref’s let him get away with it, why not hug? its the ref responsibility to stop the hugging, not Wlad ! and Yes Holyfield did his part in the Tyson fight. It’s a bad trend that needs to be dealt with, cause it just makes for a horrible watch. if they going to allow hugging, at least allow time for the short guy to fight on the inside , I can’t stand repeated quick breaks as a solution to the problem, simply because it gives the shorter fighter no chance to win either let them fight out, or take a point away . . The fact of the matter is Holding is a foul ! Holding is against the rules of boxing and is universally recognized as a foul, enforce the rules ! It’s Simple.Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
No, he would have been KO'd with out the holding. But like a Klit head said, look how Holyfield fought Tyson, with a lot of holding. Holyfield didn't ride Tyson or jump up then come down on his neck with all his weight like Wlad did with Peter though. And gift knockdowns? When you turn your back in a fight, a la Joe Fraizer vs Goerge Foreman, expect to be hit in the back of the head a good one.Originally Posted by Bx730NY
"You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"
C'mon man, you lost all credibility with the Toney and Mayorga worship...Originally Posted by Hulk
just go to bed and let the grown-ups talk this one out!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks